William Barr Wants to Kill Privacy and Security…’For the Children’

U.S. Attorney General William Barr, along with co-conspirators in the UK and Australia, recently wrote a letter to Mark Zuckerberg requesting he not move forward with a plan to implement end-to-end encryption across Facebook’s messaging services. A draft of the letter was published earlier this month by Buzzfeed, and it’s worth examining in some detail.

What immediately strikes you is the letter’s emphasis on “protecting the children,” a talking point universally used by authoritarians throughout history to justify both a reduction of public liberty and a transfer of increased power to the state. Though this tactic is transparent and well understood by those paying attention, it’s nevertheless disturbing to observe Barr’s disingenuous and shameless use of it (the words ‘child’ and ‘children’ appear 17 times in the course of this brief letter).

Here’s just one example from the letter:

Companies should not deliberately design their systems to preclude any form of access to content, even for preventing or investigating the most serious crimes. This puts our citizens and societies at risk by severely eroding a company’s ability to detect and respond to illegal content and activity, such as child sexual exploitation and abuse, terrorism, and foreign adversaries’ attempts to undermine democratic values and institutions, preventing the prosecution of offenders and safeguarding of victims. It also impedes law enforcement’s ability to investigate these and other serious crimes. Risks to public safety from Facebook’s proposals are exacerbated in the context of a single platform that would combine inaccessible messaging services with open profiles, providing unique routes for prospective offenders to identify and groom our children.

Barr and the U.S. government feign deep concern regarding the ability of bad people to “identify and groom our children,” yet this is the same guy and government who allowed Jeffrey Epstein to be suicided in a Department of Justice prison just a few months ago. It’s the same guy and government who can’t find or doesn’t want to find Ghislaine Maxwell. And it’s same guy and government that can’t be bothered to raid Epstein’s New Mexico ranch despite known instances of child abuse there.

Allegations of sex abuse against Epstein in New Mexico date back to the mid-1990s. An affidavit filed in April alleges Epstein and his supposed ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell told a 15-year-old girl to “take off all of her clothes” and then “touched her inappropriately” on a massage table at the ranch in 1996.

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday morning, an accuser claims Epstein coerced the girl to engage in sex acts at Zorro Ranch between 2007 and 2010.

How stupid do they think we are?

Moreover, there are several reasons aside from the clearly corrupt and dishonest handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case that should lead to distrust in William Barr. Despite all the empty talk of Trump “draining the swamp,” there are few individuals alive today more swampy than Attorney General Barr.

Naturally, there’s more. Here’s some of what the man was up to while Attorney General under the first Bush.

The Justice Department under Attorney General William Barr launched a vast surveillance program that gathered records of innocent Americans’ international phone calls without first conducting a review of whether it was legal, the department’s inspector general concluded Thursday.

It happened in 1992, the last time Barr served as attorney general.

The secret program, run by the Drug Enforcement Administration, ultimately gathered billions of records of nearly all phone calls from the United States to 116 countries, with little oversight from Congress or the courts, a USA TODAY investigation found. It provided a blueprint for far broader phone-data surveillance the government launched after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

It appears the entire unconstitutional mass surveillance apparatus we have today was actually birthed via secret actions taken by Barr nearly three decades ago, and he’s now come back to finish the job. This man has a long and well-documented track record of despising liberty and human privacy.

Finally, it’s noteworthy that the one time Facebook actually tries to do the right thing by its users is when the state gets all hot and bothered. To understand exactly what’s at stake here, take a read of an opinion-piece authored by Edward Snowden earlier today.

Excepts via The Guardian:

In the midst of the greatest computer security crisis in history, the US government, along with the governments of the UK and Australia, is attempting to undermine the only method that currently exists for reliably protecting the world’s information: encryption. Should they succeed in their quest to undermine encryption, our public infrastructure and private lives will be rendered permanently unsafe…

Donald Trump’s attorney general, William Barr, who authorised one of the earliest mass surveillance programmes without reviewing whether it was legal, is now signalling an intention to halt – or even roll back – the progress of the last six years. WhatsApp, the messaging service owned by Facebook, already uses end-to-end encryption (E2EE): in March the company announced its intention to incorporate E2EE into its other messaging apps – Facebook Messenger and Instagram – as well. Now Barr is launching a public campaign to prevent Facebook from climbing this next rung on the ladder of digital security. This began with an open letter co-signed by Barr, UK home secretary Priti Patel, Australia’s minister for home affairs and the US secretary of homeland security, demanding Facebook abandon its encryption proposals.

If Barr’s campaign is successful, the communications of billions will remain frozen in a state of permanent insecurity: users will be vulnerable by design. And those communications will be vulnerable not only to investigators in the US, UK and Australia, but also to the intelligence agencies of China, Russia and Saudi Arabia – not to mention hackers around the world…

The true explanation for why the US, UK and Australian governments want to do away with end-to-end encryption is less about public safety than it is about power: E2EE gives control to individuals and the devices they use to send, receive and encrypt communications, not to the companies and carriers that route them. This, then, would require government surveillance to become more targeted and methodical, rather than indiscriminate and universal.

The state doesn’t care about the children and it doesn’t care about you. The only thing it cares about is power and control over the citizenry. Let’s not get conned for the millionth time.

Liberty Blitzkrieg is now 100% ad free. To make this a successful, sustainable thing consider the following options.

You can become a Patron.

You can visit the Support Page to donate via PayPal, Bitcoin or send cash/check in the mail.

Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

7 thoughts on “William Barr Wants to Kill Privacy and Security…’For the Children’”

  1. Big Brother has grown and will continue to grow due to dopey Americans playing the red/blue game. The MAGA crowd will defend Barr because Trump appointed him. Red teamers in general supported the Patriot Act nonsense after 9/11. Blue teamers feigned disgust but then supported it as soon as Obama was in office.

    The formula is simple. To red teamers, say it’s for national security, Israel, Christianity, law and order, etc. For blue teamers, say you’re fighting extremists, racism, sexism, or general bigotry. Most people will happily sign up for this us-versus-them paradigm and sign away their rights and both teams will do it “for the children”.

    The Epstein case, shocking as it was, didn’t have much effect because it was broken down into palatable red/blue versions, making it much easier for Americans to digest and forget. Either the Clintons are the world’s ultimate criminal masterminds, or Trump is the biggest sleazeball ever. Few people bother to notice that the two teams work together for the most part along with the banks and the MIC, or that politicians are just puppets.

    We can’t vote our way out of this. There are exactly two ways out in collapse or revolution. People won’t rebel because they still think they have too much to lose, particularly Boomers, plus they would have to admit they were wrong about the red/blue game all along. Collapse is the far more likely scenario, but that’s still at least 5-10 years away. With bankers printing to the moon to save their hides, I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if we stagger along like this for another 20 years!

    None of this is pleasant to think about, but at least we all have time to position ourselves while we wait for the big reset.

    Reply
  2. “The rights of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects (emails, phone calls & texts, internet browsing records and cell phone location tracking), against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or thing to be seized.”

    The Founders of the United States were explicit in wording the 4th Amendment of the Bill of Rights – OK, I added my definition of ‘and effects’.

    Here are some words of warning that should be taken to heart.

    John Adams: “A Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.”

    Ben Franklin: “Any society that would give a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”

    Charles de Montesquieu: “There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.”

    President George Washington: “It will be found an unjust, and unwise jealousy to deprive a man his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it.”

    James Madison: “Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his persons, his faculties, or his possessions.”

    Mahatma Gandhi: “You assist an evil system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees. An evil system never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it means partaking of the evil. A good person will resist an evil with his or her whole soul.”

    Mr. Michael Krieger is helping us resist this evil of laws being enacted to take away our privacy and freedom. I thank you for that Michael, and dare I say that Gandhi would certainly view you as a good person!

    To all readers, I wish you Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

    Reply
    • Excellent and very pertinent quotes Daniel, I thank you and support ANY awareness of the true value of freedom. EVERY scrap of security comes at a loss of freedom (liberty).

  3. Just ‘ditto’ and ‘bravo’ to Michael, … and Tengen and Daniel. (Now I’m off to forward this post…..I think it should be read by many, nay, all citizens.

    Reply
  4. Just once I want to see Mike write an article actually targeting lefties. There’s an attempted coup going on towards a duly elected president and not a peep from Mike. The 2 years of that Russian farce and not a peep from Mike. The MSM is clearly nothing but a propaganda arm for the democrats and if they had their way, they’d enslave every single person in the country and force them to join the leftist cult yet not a peep from Mike. These are things that target the public’s liberty but again, not a peep from Mike.

    Mike’s a complete fraud. He’s a leftist that tries to pretend he’s just out there for liberty and is unbiased.

    I’d kind of love to see one of these mentally ill dems win next year so I can watch Mike not write anything negative about that admin.

    Reply
    • This is so transparently false and filled with lies it’s actually funny.
      Literally my last post before this one addresses exactly what you claim I never address. Read it here: https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2019/10/09/a-road-to-hell-paved-with-bad-intentions/
      Also, I suggest everyone search Russiagate on my website to see for yourself how this person is intentionally lying.
      I also spent 8 years straight hammering on Obama for the fraud he was.
      If you’re gonna lie, at least don’t make it so easy to disprove.

    • What in the holy fuck are you talking about? Mike has been writing and tweeting about corruption and bad actors on all sides of the political spectrum for YEARS now. Please do the world a favor and pull your head out of your ass before making a nasty, bogus reply.

Leave a Reply