31 thoughts on “Censorship Is What Happens When Powerful People Get Scared”

  1. You make good points however I still don’t believe you are getting to the root source of the evil. Please target your research towards the Khazarian Talmudic Zionists.
    Are you sure Alex Jones isn’t a front man for the Secret Shadow Government(SSG)?
    Does Julian Assange have Mossad ties?
    The US Inc. began in 1933. The elections are nothing more than an illusion.
    Trump as every prez since ´33 was selected not elected.
    The SSG simply want authoritarianism through the guise of socialism.
    First they need to destroy the US Inc.

    Reply
    • Henny you are right on the mark, the idea Alex Jones is some “freedom fighter” is about as plausible as POS Zionist Trump is a patriotic American. How stupid do they think we are? JUST LIKE TRUMP, the SMS and much of the Zionist controlled “alt media” are conducting another psy-op this time with Alex Jones to make him the alt-darling and standard bearer for him and his misinformation program. Jones blames everything on the Saudis and China, omitting his Zionist Jewish paymasters whom are the true villains.

    • I’ve heard it suggested that Assange may have Mossad ties because Wikileaks hasn’t published anything against Israel. But if he did, would he allow himself to be in effect imprisoned for 6 years at the Ecuadorian embassy, causing his declining health, to be refused to see his family at all? Who would put up with that for the sake of Mossad? Would he not have begun publishing a few of the documents that he has assumedly received that are embarrassing to Israel, as a signal to Mossad that he won’t put up with the abuse?
      It’s much more likely that he just hasn’t received anything from an Israeli whistleblower.

  2. Good points, Michael. Still learning and in shock how corrupt and unaccountable these elites are. I’ve only been awakened a couple of years,
    and it still blows my mind. So many areas are so corrupt, from medicine to the food industry, financial, govt, you name it. So many LIES out there.

    Reply
  3. Sistema corrupto, falso, etc sim . Fracassado tenho as minhas dúvidas. O sistema é uma piramide onde se delega a falsidade e os ganhos em decrescente.

    Reply
  4. I so enjoy your persective. Migrating to alternative platforms, some block chain based, may be part of the answer. MySpace anyone?

    Reply
  5. Just keep writing on your wordpress blogs. Let’s hope wordpress doesn’t get corrupted. If it gets super bad people can actually require people to log into an account to see their content. Not sure it will come to that. My guess WW3 actors are choosing sides right now. And I think US is going to be more isolated than it realizes. I would not trust Trump. I voted for him, btw. One of those deplorables who could not stand Hillary to such a degree I went ahead and chanced my vote with DT.

    Reply
    • At this particular point in time it doesn’t really matter who the puppet president of the US happens to be.

      The .001% has Trump where they want him. On his heels due to the Russian Snipe hunt. That was their Plan B if he was elected, and they are implementing it exactly.

      So they will get what they want out of Trump.

      Michael is correct about them taking these overt censorship actions because they are afraid. There is no doubt that they would have preferred to float the censorship trial balloon at a later date.

      But the Universe has intervened and caused them to act too soon. Now they’re like an advanced skier trying to ski a black diamond slope with a lot of trees and only one ski pole.

    • If “hot” WW3 starts then – and it was long stated by many – USA was selected to be next Big Meanie, next Hitler, next Napoleon, next “big scaring threat” that would make few initial fanfare victories to make rest of the world unite and squash it after many bitter sacrifices. Alternatively, WW3 may already be going as economic war (it is soothing to think the economic war is substitution not merely foreplay).

      Today everyone knows what evil crimes did Third Reich – and it lampshades the same things England and Belgium did in their colonies.

      Tomorrow every school class would have a course of American crimes against humanity in the 21st century, and those would be the only crimes ever mentioned.

      BTW i repeat WW3 analogue explains this censorship. Before WW2 USSR prohibited their citizens to have radio receivers with free wave tuning. Big wars need control over the country, including control over population.

      Will there be economic collapse and civil war inside America or a desperate Hitleresque attempt to conquer compeating countries, both ways USA would have, to quote Michael himself, “brace for impact”. Limiting uncontrolled population behavior, like Alex Jones narratives, is perhaps exactly that very bracing. Frankly, if the impact gets inevitable, what should rulers practically do to brace themselves and their sheeple? One may say them being “scared of the impact”.

      Controlling internet more and more tightly goes around the world.
      Twitter and Facebook used to control population in other governments “homes”. And US rulers know it more intimately than anyone else.

      Long term effect would be people dispersing from Gang Of Six platforms, hopefully finding better less centralized way to regain vast mass communication. But short term would be just chilling. People would get automized into small groups on different unrelated niche platforms. Unable to get together, feel together, panic together, act together.

      If impact is really hanging over then maybe rulers would reach for short-term effects and about long term losses “they would think tomorrow”?..

  6. The neoliberal globalists refuse to accept the demise of their decades long agenda… the end of the nation-state, the permanent death knell of democracy, maybe the literal dismantling of the Capitol and WH as HQ becomes the vastly expanded MIC.

    The reason other nations like Denmark and China are doing much better is that, unlike the US, the State still has regulatory control of their private banks.

    Here, they’re running the joint!

    “The bank strategy continues: “If we can privatize the economy, we can turn the whole public sector into a monopoly. We can treat what used to be the government sector as a financial monopoly. Instead of providing free or subsidized schooling, we can make people pay $50,000 to get a college education, or $50,000 just to get a grade school education if families choose to go to New York private schools. We can turn the roads into toll roads. We can charge people for water, and we can charge for what used to be given for free under the old style of Roosevelt capitalism and social democracy.”

    This idea that governments should not create money implies that they shouldn’t act like governments. Instead, the de facto government should be Wall Street. Instead of governments allocating resources to help the economy grow, Wall Street should be the allocator of resources – and should starve the government to “save taxpayers” (or at least the wealthy). Tea Party promoters want to starve the government to a point where it can be “drowned in the bathtub.”

    But if you don’t have a government that can fund itself, then who is going to govern, and on whose terms? The obvious answer is, the class with the money: Wall Street and the corporate sector. They clamor for a balanced budget, saying, “We don’t want the government to fund public infrastructure. We want it to be privatized in a way that will generate profits for the new owners, along with interest for the bondholders and the banks that fund it; and also, management fees. Most of all, the privatized enterprises should generate capital gains for the stockholders as they jack up prices for hitherto public services.

    You can see how to demoralize a country if you can stop the government from spending money into the economy. That will cause austerity, lower living standards and really put the class war in business. So what Trump is suggesting is to put the class war in business, financially, with an exclamation point.”

    http://michael-hudson.com/2017/03/why-deficits-hurt-banking-profits/

    Hudson: As Samir Amin said at the meeting yesterday, China is the economy that is trying to be the exception to the Western economic model. That model is forcing a choice between civilization and barbarism. The West is moving rapidly into economic barbarism and militarism. As you can see, the austerity program of the Euro is destroying the economy there. The United States is cutting taxes on the rich, while indebting the working class very highly. The one country that is independent and not taking the advice of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund is China.

    http://michael-hudson.com/2018/08/life-thought-an-autobiography/

    Reply
    • China does not fit into any equation involving other countries. They have stolen our manufacturing, technology, and military secrets. They have manipulated their currency while stockpiling gold. China owns our ‘elected’ representatives as they always vote in favor of China.

      Their economy has nothing to do with normal principles as a mafia owned business does not compare to a similar legitimately owned business.

  7. Every author or anyone wanting publicity knows the value of being denounced publicly by a Bishop or being “Banned in Boston”. In the early 70s everyone at my school had a copy of Mao’s “Little Red Book”, banned in the west! – And we all read it with far more interest than Shakespeare or “prescribed” reading.
    So, I agree, it will backfire!

    Reply
  8. “Ultimately, it’s safer for society to have open public forums where all ideas — whether you consider them dangerous and crazy or not — can be openly expressed alongside each other. That way we can see what’s out there and debate or debunk them in front of large and diverse audiences.”

    This is a noble philosophy, but has zero regard for morality or human psychology. Human society would never operate like that. All ideas are not created equal, and debating and debunking is 1) often ineffective because arrogance keeps people holding onto ideas even if there’s good reason not to and 2) often come down to skill in language and rhetoric, the winner is the one better at framing arguments and controling the narrative, not necessarily the one with the right information. There needs to be governance (somehow, by whom I’m not sure) so as to protect public wellbeing from dangerous, threatening, and intentionally false and misleading information. That’s not a bad thing.

    And besides, how can any true “open public forum” be controlled by a private entity? Twitter, etc have the right to restrict access, just like AJ has the right to create his own forum if he can find it. Or he can literally go to the town square.

    Reply
    • “There needs to be governance (somehow, by whom I’m not sure) so as to protect public wellbeing from dangerous, threatening, and intentionally false and misleading information. That’s not a bad thing.”

      Actually, that’s already been proven to be a really bad thing, Derek.

      As soon as anyone starts taking actions to “protect public wellbeing” with regard to “information”, it creates fertile ground for propagandists to tell the public what is, and what is not, to be believed. (I.E.- “fake news”).

      That is why this is the foundation of the US Constitution.

      “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

      As soon as this country starts “abridging the freedom of speech” under the auspices of protecting “public wellbeing” liberty goes out the window, and tyrants enter through that same window to establish tyranny.

      The Framers knew that all too well as a result of their experiential knowledge gained by dealing with the tyrant known then as “Mother England”.

      Our current group of statists within the corporatist State would love nothing more than to become a modern day version of Mother England. They’ve already got a really good start. But they need a “Ministry of Truth” to solidify their goal.

  9. I think western elites want the society Hitler’s Nazis would have given them where they’d be totally unaccountable. In 1984 Orwell said technology will allow them total control and now the microchip gives them almost everything they need: CCTV surveillance; digital comm’s; data storage; entry keypads; automation; electronic banking; cellphone tracking; RFID and so on.

    Parallel with that neoliberal policies break down social cohesion so we end up unable to organize ourselves like before. As unemployment and austerity bite deep people meet and talk so much less. Technology and neoliberalism could enable western elites to dismantle the working classes completely. Our wealth and particularly our young, not just as cannon fodder and cheap labor but as sex objects too, would be totally at their bidding. And “disposable”.

    Reply
  10. Man I’m so old I remember when liberalism meant you fearlessly exposed yourself to new ideas all the time, life was a constant re evaluation of why do I believe what I believe. Still is for me. And conservatism meant even though you supported unbridled personal freedom you recognized the personal slavery of following your most craven desires all the time. All things in moderation was the battle cry. That was between 1969 and 1979 for me.

    Reply
  11. Censorship is literally hate speech because you actually hate what someone else has to say, and have no rebuttal other than to silence them.

    Reply
    • So, you think Tucker Carleson would still be on Fox if he was truly speaking truth to power…Have you not witnessed those who truly challenged authority? One need only look at the parade of talking heads who questioned Israel to see what happens to real patriots. You who buy this are just useful idiots, doing the bidding of your controllers, so sad but so true.

  12. So, Alex Jones, the man who claims China is taking over Hollywood and Saudis were behind 9/11, even though anyone with a brain knows Israel and the Zionists did 9/11 and run Hollywood, and US foreign and domestic policy. NOPE, this is just another broad spectrum assault on the minds of Americans. They did the same thing with Trump, driving hordes of otherwise waking up Americans into the arms of Trump, who is doing everything the Zionist “Deep State” desire, all to the crocodile tears of the media, covering his actions as if they are not truly happy Trump is in office. Americans are far too easily duped by this nonsense, I guess they just don’t get how far along Zionist control has become. Mark Twain once said “it is easier to fool a man, than it is to convince him he has been fooled”.

    Reply

Leave a Reply