In case you missed it, last Thursday our illustrious House of Representatives voted on an amendment that would have blocked the possibility for the President to lock up American citizens without a trial. Unsurprisingly, our so-called “representatives” once again voted against protecting the constitutional rights of the citizenry in the name of the Orwellian, never-ending “war on terror.” If you need a refresher on the NDAA and the authoritarian power it grants the executive branch, I suggest you read one of my most popular posts ever: NDAA: The Most Important Lawsuit in American History that No One is Talking About.
After the amendment’s failure, its sponsor Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash) correctly called out Republicans for their complete and total hypocrisy when it comes to “big government.” He stated:
“This is a vote against the United States constitution and it is a vote against due process. It is mind-boggling and extremely disappointing that the party who claims to fear big government overreach has voted against an amendment to prevent the government from indefinitely detaining individuals detained on U.S. soil –- including U.S. citizens.”
Now from the Huffington Post:
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of Representatives voted again Thursday to allow the indefinite military detention of Americans, blocking an amendment that would have barred the possibility.
Supporters of detention argue that the nation needs to be able to arrest and jail suspected terrorists without trial, including Americans on U.S. soil, for as long as there is a war on terror. Their argument won, and the measure was defeated by a vote of 200 to 226.
But opponents, among them the Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), who offered the amendment to end that authority, argued that such detention is a stain on the Constitution that unnecessarily militarizes U.S. law enforcement.
“It is a dangerous step toward executive and military power to allow things like indefinite detention under military control within the U.S.,” Smith said. “That’s the heart and essence of this issue.”
Smith’s amendment, which also had Republican sponsors including Reps. Chris Gibson (N.Y.) and Justin Amash (Mich.), would guarantee that anyone arrested in the United States gets a trial.
You know, we need to destroy the country in order to save it. For a full list of the Representatives that voted for and against the amendment go here. In the event your Representative failed to vote yes, I suggest you call, email and tweet at their office in order to express your extreme displeasure.
Full article here.
In Liberty,
Mike
Follow me on Twitter!
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G
Follow me on Twitter.
‘we need to destroy the country in order to save it.’ ha ha
Yes, and we also need to vote for reps that don’t represent us, because the other guy is even worse!
Well this explains what all the FEMA camps are for then. When the economy collapses, Obama will use his new Nationwide Tv broadcast to declare martial law. Then DHS will come for our guns and lockup whoever refuses as terrorist. Considering that the bulk of American poplulation is illegals, we have a slim chance of beating this.
Let’s not forget that bills must be passed before they can be read. What a disgusting, corrupt, morally degenerate group of low-lifes running this government. No wonder they’re called CONgress; instead of PROgress
I This information makes no sense to me. John B carson
I went to the roll call and saw that it was extremely partisan. So I Iooked up the bill instead and tried to find the parts mentioned in the headline on this blog and also the HuffPo article. All I gotta say is that bill is 778 pages of the worst trampling all over the Contstitution, the Bill of Rights and an outright affront to Humanity. How can anyone even discuss what the Dems tried to modify and the Rhinos voted against? The entire bill is total BS and the fact that we even debate the fine points is just another exercise in double speak. Its like have the jackboot of big government pressing on our necks and then debating if the jackboot should have the mud wiped off of it before more pressure is applied.
Is this something like the Health Care Bill, we must past it to view what is in it? Certainly we are under attack by the 3rd world soceity, and I think this is totally uncalled for to destroy our soceity to save it…how stupid do you think the people really are…????