Glenn Greenwald on Hillary Clinton: “Soulless, Principle-Free, Power Hungry…”

Screen Shot 2014-11-14 at 10.08.22 AMOne attribute I like most about Glenn Greenwald is that he never pulls punches. One of his most prescient and cutting political lines came earlier this year when he made some observations on the upcoming 2016 Presidential election, in which two status quo, corrupt, bloodthirsty con-artists will compete for the Oval Office. While we don’t yet know which crony the GOP will put up, Hillary is pretty much a foregone conclusion for the Democrats. Greenwald observed:

Hillary is banal, corrupted, drained of vibrancy and passion. I mean, she’s been around forever, the Clinton circle. She’s a fucking hawk and like a neocon, practically. She’s surrounded by all these sleazy money types who are just corrupting everything everywhere. But she’s going to be the first female president, and women in America are going to be completely invested in her candidacy. Opposition to her is going to be depicted as misogynistic, like opposition to Obama has been depicted as racist. It’s going to be this completely symbolic messaging that’s going to overshadow the fact that she’ll do nothing but continue everything in pursuit of her own power. They’ll probably have a gay person after Hillary who’s just going to do the same thing.

You can read that and more in the post: Glenn Greenwald on the 2016 Elections – “They’ll Probably Have a Gay Person After Hillary.”

Well Greenwald is back, and this time he outlines exactly who’s excited about Hillary’s forthcoming run for the Presidency. Here are some excerpts from the Intercept:

It’s easy to strike a pose of cynicism when contemplating Hillary Clinton’s inevitable (and terribly imminent) presidential campaign. As a drearily soulless, principle-free, power-hungry veteran of DC’s game of thrones, she’s about as banal of an American politician as it gets. One of the few unique aspects to her, perhaps the only one, is how the genuinely inspiring gender milestone of her election will (following the Obama model) be exploited to obscure her primary role as guardian of the status quo.

But one shouldn’t be so jaded. There is genuine and intense excitement over the prospect of (another) Clinton presidency. Many significant American factions regard her elevation to the Oval Office as an opportunity for rejuvenation, as a stirring symbol of hope and change, as the vehicle for vital policy advances. Those increasingly inspired factions include:

Wall Street

Down on Wall Street they don’t believe (Clinton’s populist rhetoric) for a minute. While the finance industry does genuinely hate Warren, the big bankers love Clinton, and by and large they badly want her to be president. Many of the rich and powerful in the financial industry—among them, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, Tom Nides, a powerful vice chairman at Morgan Stanley, and the heads of JPMorganChase and Bank of America—consider Clinton a pragmatic problem-solver not prone to populist rhetoric. To them, she’s someone who gets the idea that we all benefit if Wall Street and American business thrive. What about her forays into fiery rhetoric? They dismiss it quickly as political maneuvers. None of them think she really means her populism.

The Israel Lobby

Let’s be clear. When it comes to Israel, there is no Bill Clinton 2.0. The former president is probably unique among presidents for the depth of his feeling for Israel and his willingness to put aside his own frustrations with certain aspects of Israel’s behavior, such as settlements. But this accommodation applies to Hillary too. Both Bill and Hillary are so enamored with the idea of Israel and its unique history that they are prone to make certain allowances for the reality of Israel’s behavior, such as the continuing construction of settlements.

Interventionists (i.e., war zealots)

“I feel comfortable with her on foreign policy,” Mr. Kagan said, adding that the next step after Mr. Obama’s more realist approach “could theoretically be whatever Hillary brings to the table” if elected president. “If she pursues a policy which we think she will pursue,” he added, “it’s something that might have been called neocon, but clearly her supporters are not going to call it that; they are going to call it something else.”

Like what, the “Mook Mafia” platform? (you’ll catch that reference later on).

Old school neocons

After nearly a decade in the political wilderness, the neoconservative movement is back. . . . Even as they castigate Mr. Obama, the neocons may be preparing a more brazen feat: aligning themselves with Hillary Rodham Clinton and her nascent presidential campaign, in a bid to return to the driver’s seat of American foreign policy. . . .

Other neocons have followed [Robert] Kagan’s careful centrism and respect for Mrs. Clinton. Max Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted in The New Republic this year that “it is clear that in administration councils she was a principled voice for a strong stand on controversial issues, whether supporting the Afghan surge or the intervention in Libya.”

It’s easy to imagine Mrs. Clinton’s making room for the neocons in her administration. No one could charge her with being weak on national security with the likes of Robert Kagan on board. . . . Far from ending, then, the neocon odyssey is about to continue. In 1972, Robert L. Bartley, the editorial page editor of The Wall Street Journal and a man who championed the early neocon stalwarts, shrewdly diagnosed the movement as representing “something of a swing group between the two major parties.” Despite the partisan battles of the early 2000s, it is remarkable how very little has changed.

There’s quite a bit more to the post, which I suggest reading in full.

If for some strange reason that isn’t enough to get you jazzed up for oligarch-coddler Hillary Clinton’s campaign, perhaps some insight into the people who might run her presidential bid will change your mind. They refer to themselves as the “Mook Mafia,” and it’s basically a couple of power thirsty adolescents. Some of their emails were leaked to ABC News:

For the past five years, a prominent Democratic operative who is a leading contender to manage a Hillary Clinton presidential campaign has maintained a private email listserv for friends and associates that carries a provocative name: the “Mook Mafia.”

The listserv, which one member said reaches more than 150 fellow campaign veterans, has been a means for Robby Mook and a close friend Marlon Marshall to stay connected with many of the operatives who would likely populate a Democratic presidential campaign in 2016. Mook and Marshall have both been mentioned as possible Hillary Clinton campaign managers.

“I know many of you are out there on campaigns, crushing it mafia style,” Marshall wrote. “We unfortunately didn’t do a call this year, but Robby and I wanted to start a chain to acknowledge many in our great family who have been out there busting their tails for all that is right in the world.

“We also wanted you to know that this years reunion will actually be held early next year, January or February, and likely in New York for a weekend. Apologies for the late notice and for not sending anything out on a reunion. Please believe there will be one. The planning committee has just been a tad busy!”

The email was signed “MM,” with Marshall adding a hashtag: #mafia4life.

In the more substantive messages, though, Marshall emerges as the more aggressive of the duo. Writing in January 2010 to urge fellow “mafia” members to work hard on behalf of Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley, Marshall offered “an overall big thank you to everyone on this list who continues to fight the good fight.”

“F U Republicans. Mafia till I die,” he wrote. “If you have just a few minutes, hop on that activate and punish those voters!” (“Activate” is an apparent reference to a software program allowing volunteers to contact targeted voters by phone from anywhere in the country.)

The following year, in confirming news that he would be taking a new job that would include a move to Chicago, Marshall offered special thanks to Mook.

“First, the mafia never separates, it just continues to grow and expand and move into other states in order to destroy Republicans,” he wrote. “A special thanks to none other than the namesake himself, Deacon Robby Mook. Without him, there would be no mafia and I for sure know I would not have learned as much as I have in this business and have this opportunity.”

Mook responded by announcing “mandatory” attendance at a goodbye party for Marshall at a Capitol Hill bar.

“It’s true: Marlon Marshall is leaving our fold. Today is the day the grownassman [sic] grows up and leaves for America’s Second City. I know this prodical [sic] son will return to the mafia manger soon enough to smite Republicans mafia-style,” Mook wrote.

You can’t make this stuff up. I don’t know about you, but…

Screen Shot 2014-06-15 at 6.13.13 PM

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 1LefuVV2eCnW9VKjJGJzgZWa9vHg7Rc3r1


 Follow me on Twitter.

5 Comments

 Add your comment
  1. Well, her flying monkeys seem to like her.

  2. The World is vastly overpopulated. 99.9% of Humanity needs to be exterminated. A vote for Hillary in 2016 will help us achieve this goal.

  3. The election needs a crowd-sourced candidate who will refuse to take campaign money from any corporation and will run on some very simple campaign pledges…

    1. To restore the US constitution and dump any legislation on the books that contradicts or undermines it;

    2. To restore the role of gold and silver as money and abolish the federal reserve (arguably covered by pledge number one);

    3. To outlaw corporate funding of any political campaign and install Swiss-style direct democracy.

    There are of course plenty of other policies one could think of, such as imposing limits to the size of media organisations and outlawing any lobbying that is not conducted in a public arena, but it would be best to keep things simple. Occupy didn’t, and look where that went.

    If you can’t find anyone to do the job of standard bearer for a newly created Constitution Party, step forward Michael. I bet plenty would vote for you.

  4. NSA International Spying is important. What it lacks is secrecy. Who in hell let the cat out of the bag in the first place? If you don’t think we are being spied on by Russia, China, and who knows who else, then you must have just arrived here from the 18th century. Reason all you want – spying on each other is not going away! Jeff Bush is right on about this aspect of International knowing what your enemy is doing. Ask Israel if they know
    what Iran is doing and how far along they are with their bomb factory?
    I will bet they know when, when, and how! And who wants to bet that at the moment of completion of the Iran bomb at some secret location that no one knows – it will mysteriously detonate by some other mysterious source. Thank you, Mr Netanyahu! I would vote him to be our President if that were possible. The world would be much safer, believe me.

    • Michael Krieger

      In case it wasn’t obvious to you, the reason Snowden leaked is because he saw the U.S. government was violating the Constitutional rights of AMERICAN citizens. Whether or not you think the violation of foreigners is equally important, is besides the point here. It’s pretty obvious Snowden wouldn’t have leaked anything if the U.S. government wasn’t violating U.S. citizens’ rights.

      The world has always been a scary place. All of us are also going to die eventually. Pigs in a pen are also very safe. While I’m here on the planet and alive, I want to feel true liberty. Not be scared 24/7 like you.

      I suggest you turn yourself in to the nearest prison and ask for solitary. You’ll be quite safe and get three free meals a day. Leave those of us who know what life is all about alone.

Leave a Reply

4 Trackbacks

  1. This is Why Rand Paul is Hilary Clinton’s Worst Nightmare | Liberty Blitzkrieg (Pingback)
  2. Hilary Clinton Exposed Part 1 – How She Aggressively Lobbied for Mega Corporations as Secretary of State | Liberty Blitzkrieg (Pingback)
  3. Jeb Bush Exposed Part 2 – He Thinks Unconstitutional NSA Spying is “Hugely Important” | Liberty Blitzkrieg (Pingback)
  4. This is How Hillary Does Business – An Oil Company, Human Rights Abuses in Colombia and the Clinton Foundation | Liberty Blitzkrieg (Pingback)