Should U.S. Taxpayers Be Funding the Brookings Institution?

Today’s post highlights an interesting audit on the Brookings Institution by Open the Books, which reveals considerable tax payer funding for the so-called “think tank.” The question is how much thinking is really being done, and are taxpayers getting their money’s worth?

Here’s some of what Open the Books’ Adam Andrzejewski had to say on the matter in a recent Forbes article, Brookings Institution — The Progressive Jukebox Funded By U.S. Taxpayers:

Washington, D.C. is known for its monuments, but it is also known for its “ivory tower” think tanks. These institutions can serve a valuable role in providing dispassionate and empirical analysis in divided times. One of the pre-eminent D.C. think tanks is the Brookings Institution, which has nearly half-a-billion dollars in assets and deep ties to political leaders on the left.

According to Brookings, its mission is to “conduct in-depth research that leads to new ideas for solving problems facing society at the local, national and global level.” Brookings says it values the independence of its scholars and prides itself on “open-minded” inquiry.

Yet, public spending records captured by our organization at OpenTheBooks.com tell a somewhat different story. Rather than focusing on “open-minded” inquiry, Brookings seems swayed by “open-wallet” inquiry. In many cases, Brookings doesn’t resemble a think tank, but a jukebox – add a little coin and Brookings will play your tune, if the price is right.

And these aren’t just dollars provided by private donors — these are your tax dollars funding partisan advocacy projects and papers.

Since 2008, Brookings amassed nearly $20 million in contracts and grants from 50 agencies – including the Obama Administration’s Office of the President. Despite assets of $496 million (IRS990, FY2014), our OpenTheBooks.com audit shows it was not enough. Brookings instituted an aggressive strategy to pursue federal business over the past nine-years.

Under current federal law, none of this is illegal, but the question is whether it’s ethical to secretly coerce taxpayers into supporting partisan causes. Moreover, an organization loses all credibility to hold government accountable when the government becomes a donor. (To see the full list of the 227 federal awards to America’s foremost liberal think-tank, click here.)

But it’s not just U.S. taxpayer funding that presents a concern when it comes to Brookings. There have also been pay to play allegations.

In 2014, a New York Times expose alleged that Brookings raked in corporate donations then conferred fellowships and issued policy reports helpful to its donors. Brookings also refused to disclose foreign government donations. From the New York Times oversight of Brookings:

“If a member of Congress is using the Brookings reports, they should be aware — they are not getting the full story,” said Saleem Ali, who served as a visiting fellow at the Brookings Doha Center in Qatar and who said he had been told during his job interview that he could not take positions critical of the Qatari government in papers. “They may not be getting a false story, but they are not getting the full story.”

Brookings Senior Fellow Jonathan Rauch shockingly argued for “honest graft” in “The Case for Corruption” published by The Atlantic in 2014. Rausch explained, “Dirty graft is parasitic, mere larceny, whereas honest graft helps knit together a patronage network that ensures leaders can lead and followers will follow.” Mr. Rausch is still on staff.

As usual, taxpayer money well spent.

Read the entire article here.

Screen Shot 2016-09-02 at 1.29.55 PM

Open the Books is a nonpartisan, non-profit organization focused on providing transparency in government. I’m honored to have them as a Liberty Blitzkrieg partner since 2015.

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

7 thoughts on “Should U.S. Taxpayers Be Funding the Brookings Institution?”

    • Absolutely, Jim .. The Brookings Institute’s nothing more than another Clinton Global Initiative aka charity fraud and stash fund for wealthy commies should not only be axed, but the taxpayers have to be compensated, i.e., given refunds.

  1. If Brookings is a left leaning think tank I’ll eat my hat. Of course ‘left’ in America today means to be on the political spectrum, about where Ronnie Raygun’s Republicans were situated. If this was a true ‘leftist’ think tank they would be anti war, corportism, neo-liberalism and pro nationalizing public health (single user) and any other service universally important to the people like electricity generation and grids. They would also be championing the merits of socialism and not writing pro imperialist papers such as “Which Road to Persia?”

    As for receiving taxpayer dollars or contracting with the government to give a right wing opinion to be used by government to point to as backup I’d have to say a big Nyet. Why pay for something the plutocracy will inform you of for free?

    Reply
  2. I have no opinion, the experts know best, I will follow the authorities leadership, I will not question. I am a good little pleb and will follow along. Another fine example of well spent tax dollars, keep up the good work as our honorable public servants always do.
    Sincere Thanks, Mr. Faqu

    Reply
  3. Jukebox? Sounds more like a racket to me. In the style of the Mafia of the ole’ days. In a way, i don’t blame them. It’s a nice way to make a living, with such a free flow of money, unaccountable at that. And may God bless you Mr. Krieger . Will it do anything to expose this racket any further than from this article? I doubt it. Too many people making a lot of money to stop it. They will go through the motions to make it look like something will be done. But in the end….nothing. “The government and us are cut from the same cloth.” Sam Giancana, former Chicago crime boss.

    Reply

Leave a Reply