Why Trump Should Offer Tulsi Gabbard a Senior Role in His Administration

screen-shot-2016-11-22-at-10-00-32-am

Anyone who’s been reading me for more than a couple of days understands that I have serious reservations about Donald Trump. My concerns stem primarily from his authoritarian tendencies, as well as his stated disregard for civil liberties. Nevertheless, as I outlined in my post-election piece, Americans Roll the Dice With President Donald Trump, I very much want Trump to succeed, because this country needs him to succeed. Tens of millions of our fellow citizens are suffering under the weight of undue financial burdens, largely the result of an economy completely controlled by unethical and ruthless oligarchs thanks to their bought and paid for political stooges. This unholy union needs to be shattered before this country can be “made great again.”

Will Trump actually do what needs to be done? I have my doubts, but doubt isn’t going to lead to positive change. In these early months before Trump picks all of his personnel, it is imperative that we signal to him what would be acceptable behavior, and what would be considered unforgivable betrayal.

As such, from the very beginning I have advocated that Trump work closely with those forces in the opposition who actually want to make economic existence once again bearable for countless struggling Americans. Trump should ignore corporatist frauds irrespective of their political leanings (red/blue sports team colors), and unite the public along productive populist policy lines as opposed to blind, counterproductive partisan loyalties.

In this respect, I was very pleased to hear that Trump recently met with Democratic Rep. from Hawaii, Tulsi Gabbard. If you aren’t familiar with her, you need to get up to speed fast. I highlighted her courageous stance during the Democratic primary in February’s post, It’s Not Just the GOP – The Democratic Party is Also Imploding. Here’s what happened and what I thought it represented:

A rising star within the Democratic ranks, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, cut herself off from the party’s establishment by resigning from her post as vice-chairman of the Democratic National Committee and endorsing Bernie Sanders for president. 

Her position with the DNC required her to stay neutral in the primaries, but she said that “the stakes are too high.” She announced her decision on Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” and made a video where she explained her reasoning.

Gabbard, an Iraq war veteran, said she knows the cost of war firsthand. “I know how important it is that our commander-in-chief has the sound judgment required to know when to use America’s military power—and when not to use that power.”

The importance of this move cannot be understated. In no uncertain terms, this gesture publicly exposes the weakness of the “Clinton brand.” She clearly isn’t afraid of Hillary or of any repercussions from the Democratic Party elite, a fact that is underscored by the fact she came out with her endorsement after he got pummeled in South Carolina.

But let’s take a step back and think about this in the even bigger picture. You don’t get to Congress by being a political imbecile. On the surface, this move looks like career suicide, particularly since Hillary is probably about to clinch the nomination. Recall, Rep. Gabbard didn’t merely endorse Sanders after a bruising loss in South Carolina, she stepped down from her official position with the DNC to do so. This isn’t merely a statement, it’s the equivalent of dropping a neutron bomb on the Democratic establishment. So why did she do it?

While I think she genuinely agrees with Sanders on key issues, the reason she came out so aggressively is because she sees the writing on the wall. She’s playing the long game, and in the long game, Hillary Clinton represents a discredited and failed status quo, while Bernie Sanders represents a push toward the paradigm level change that will define the future.

Gabbard is not only brave, she’s politically astute and her primary stance will now pay tremendous dividends to her overall credibility moving forward. As such, Trump’s decision to meet with her the other day was a very positive move.

The Hill reports:

Donald Trump’s chief strategist Steve Bannon contacted Tulsi Gabbard to arrange Monday’s meeting with the president-elect, according to a source close to Bannon.

“He reached out to her, not vice versa,” the source told The Hill on Monday.

Many in the media raised their eyebrows when the news broke that Trump was meeting at Trump Tower Monday morning with Hawaii’s Democratic congresswoman.

But for those who know Bannon best, there was no surprise at all.

Bannon, who hates the entrenched two-party system, has long admired Gabbard. She’s an Iraq War veteran with an independent streak. Bannon, a navy veteran, was drawn to her when she began publicly excoriating the Obama administration over its plan to defeat ISIS.

“He loves Tulsi Gabbard. Loves her,” a second source familiar with Bannon’s thinking told The Hill. “Wants to work with her on everything.”

Gabbard meshes with Trump’s foreign policy views in that she vehemently opposes U.S.-led regime change. She argues the U.S. government has no business removing from power the brutal Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

In the statement she released following her meeting with Trump, Gabbard said she “felt it important to take the opportunity to meet with the President-elect now before the drumbeats of war that neocons have been beating drag us into an escalation of the war to overthrow the Syrian government.”

A Trump transition source told The Hill on Monday that Gabbard could potentially fill “a number of positions” inside the incoming administration. CNN and the New York Times have reported that she’s under consideration for United Nations ambassador. CNN also reported that she’s under consideration for State and Defense.

“Let me be clear,” Gabbard said in her statement, “I will never allow partisanship to undermine our national security when the lives of countless people lay in the balance.”

Not only is the possibility of Trump and Gabbard working together good for the nation, it offers further proof that Steve Bannon is a strategic genius. I would happily support Gabbard in a senior role within the Trump administration.

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

21 thoughts on “Why Trump Should Offer Tulsi Gabbard a Senior Role in His Administration”

    • Tulsi Gabbard is a member of the Rockefeller/CFR along with James Woolsey, John McCain, Bill Clinton and George Soros. See member lists at cfr dot org.

    • This article is crap..”you don’t get to congress by being an embecile”? No you get to congress by lying your ass off to a bunch of gullible embeciles! Why in hell should trump hire a dumocrap? that shows a definite lack of intelligence to just BE A dumocrap, plus its a Sanders the communist supporter…not NO BUT HELL NO ON THIS ONE!!

    • Screw the morons that voted for that lesbian, murdering, baby killing, lying, thieving, sell of the nations secrets…and the violator of so many laws they can’t be counted…..so who gives a shyt what they think? THEY DON’T THINK!

    • Correct ,Tulsi Gabbard would break into the Sanders wing of the Democratic Party for Trump,breaking the Left \ Right Matrix . She is courageous , outspoken ,and above all correct on on the war issue . Opposing the horrors of supporting ” rebels ” to ” enact regime change ” which has created the turmoil in the Middle East ,and refuge crises in Europe ! Congresswomen Gabbard has openly attached the ” Neoconservatives ” by name …..doing so today is considered a ” dog whistle ” , to the cabal of ex Trotskyites ,and AIPAC shills owing the ” conservative ” side of the ideological frauds . combat veteran ,brilliant ,and attractive ,please Mr.Trump out her at State ,Defense ,or Counselor to President with cabinet rank.

  1. Does Trump understand he did not win the POTUS seat ? Rather it is the Clintons who lost it. If he fails to allow the DOJ to prosecute the crook, his is a one term act. Why then would Gabbard want to be tinted by Trump ? She is better off grabbing Trumps supporters by criticize his unwillingness to prosecute the Clintons, and run for POTUS four years from now and she will win too.

    Reply
    • One can only beat the opponents in front of you. You’re seriously deluded if you think that Trump didn’t win the POTUS seat. It’s a bit like saying that Obama didn’t win in 2008 and 2012. One cannot do what you’re talking about directly. He’ll have to let the government agencies “follow the trail”.

  2. She’s a rock solid pick! Trump would be smart to appoint her and perhaps we can heal some of this insane partisan garbage on both sides. I only wish there were more politicians like Gabbard.

    Reply
    • That’s bunk …get off the old labels ,and phony Left \ Right divide ! ” Marxism ” was an invention of,and promoted by International Finance Capital ,and would of not seen the light of day without bankers backing Tulsi Gabbard is 100 % right on the foreign policy issues ,created by ex Marxists called ,” Neoconservatives ” people like you cheer !

  3. Much of the post-election media coverage has already turned negative. The media has now turned way too much of its focus on protest and plans to destabilize democracy in an effort that appears almost geared to intentionally stir the pot and emotionally agitate Americans.

    During the election the main stream media cranked out anti-Trump news and stories, it has not halted with his victory. The article below delves into whether Trump will be allowed an opportunity to govern or his efforts be sabotaged by Washington insiders.

    http://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2016/11/post-election-news-shifts-to-negative.html

    Reply

Leave a Reply