The 28-Pages Are Way Worse Than I Thought

Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 4.12.18 PM

Shortly after the release of the infamous 28-pages earlier today, the White House issued a statement dismissing allegations of Saudi involvement in the attacks of 9/11. I believe such assurances are intended to prevent people from reading it in the first place, because if you actually read them, your mouth will be wide open the entire time in disbelief.

There are only two conclusions any thinking person can come to after reading the 28-pages.

1. Elements within the Saudi government ran the operations behind the 9/11 attack.

2. The U.S. government covered it up.

But don’t take my word for it. You should read it yourself.

Just to give you a little taste, here’s what was found on the first page alone (click on the images for the entire document).

Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 4.08.04 PM

Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 4.09.45 PM

*Update: After this piece was originally posted, I have determined it would be helpful to specifically highlight some of the more disturbing sections of the report beyond the first page.

Here they are:

Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 3.16.35 PMScreen Shot 2016-07-15 at 3.28.50 PM Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 3.31.34 PM Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 4.08.04 PM

Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 4.57.36 PM Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 4.58.55 PM Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 5.43.21 PM Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 5.52.48 PM Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 6.12.31 PM Screen Shot 2016-07-15 at 6.14.38 PM

Screen Shot 2016-07-18 at 9.37.01 AM Screen Shot 2016-07-18 at 9.37.56 AM Screen Shot 2016-07-18 at 9.40.34 AM Screen Shot 2016-07-18 at 9.41.07 AM

Finally, just in case you still don’t get how unbelievably shady all of this is, I’ll leave you with the following.

Screen Shot 2016-07-18 at 9.46.28 AM

This is your government.

Here’s a link to the entire report.

For prior articles on the 28 pages, see:

Additional Evidence Emerges That U.S. Government Officials Intentionally Whitewashed the Saudi Role in 9/11

Video of the Day – 60 Minutes Explores the Saudi Links to 9/11 Attacks

Disturbing Claim – FBI Interrogated Former Senator for Wanting “28 Pages” Declassified

Two Congressmen Push for Release of 28-Page Document Showing Saudi Involvement in 9/11

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G

Follow me on Twitter.

24 thoughts on “The 28-Pages Are Way Worse Than I Thought”

  1. This IS a limited hangout as a response to the growing numbers of people knowingly stating the the 9/11/2001 event was orchestrated by elements within the U.S. establishment that conceived this attack for the advancement of their agenda. This fact questions the legitimacy of the American ruling class as nothing else. That the Sauds were apart of the conspiracy as the middle men advancing financing for some of the operation through the Pakistani secret service (Inter Services Intelligence or ISI) is a given as extremely detailed by Peter Sale Scott in his book “The Road to 9/11”.

    Enjoy the circus if you want to but the fact remains no outside entity could have pulled this off without the direct involvement of American individuals in top positions of power to disable defenses and create the narrative that ensued. This IS the definitive example of the term “limited hangout.”

    • I don’t disagree with what you say, but everyone knows the U.S. government would never release any evidence of members of the U.S. deep state being involved in 9/11.

      These pages are still important since anyone who reads them who knows anything can connect the dots. Pretty much every single lead in the pages goes back to Prince Bandar, aka Bandar Bush.

    • Yes, but Prince Bandar is but a minor player in the grand co-conspiracy, as a facilitator to the event but not as a primary planner and instigator. This release tells us nothing of the actual internal plot, only addressing the periphery as some sort of amelioration of this tragic event as the doing of others with the original narrative of nineteen box cutter wielding culprits left intact, doing nothing in challenging that obvious immense deception as another dead end brick wall between the public and the whole truth. Cheers…

    • Thanks, but I don’t see it that way.

      I believe that any thinking person with more than two brain cells to rub together will read this and come to one very important conclusion.

      The U.S. government intentionally lied about 9/11 in order to invade much of the Middle East as well as install a surveillance state at home. In my opinion, that is a very good start.

    • Your assuming that those who do not want to entertain the idea of this coup over American policy and mythical being will be willing to question beyond the implied fact of this document that the Saudis funded these attacks and instigated them. I have run into such people and have sensed the fear their minds contain of having their view of reality shattered, of the cognitive dissonance that would follow. I have even been told “I don’t want to know.” point blank. Others cling to the official story line and supplementary data to explain their positions of not wanting to entertain the implications of this coup. However, some who have somehow managed to remain asleep may now be motivated to begin questioning by this release, which is of course a good thing for society as a whole.

    • I’m just going from personal experience. In my personal everyday interactions, I find people right now more open-minded to exploring alternative ideas than any time since 2008-2010.

      So I actually think now is a key window where people are ready to hear. Perhaps your experiences are different.

    • I hear you and I certainly hope that your instinct that more people are becoming open to further explanation is correct and I applaud your’s and others efforts. I have come to the point that my personal awareness is an important part of my life but that the crusading for truth, of wanting to take people aside and explain the facts of life, is no longer a burning desire as much as it first was when first awakening. To those like yourself, a simple nod of recognition that we are in the know is often a well spring of indemnification for myself and gives me hope for us all.

  2. Looks like a first layer of the onion got peeled off after the official explanation was completely discredited and no longer believable by anyone.

    But, strangely, I see nothing in here about the controlled demolition of WTC, especially Building 7 which was not hit by any airplane?

    And I guess that Israeli Agents taken into custody and later deported back to Israel just enjoy dancing, They do it all the time?

    • I covered the shadiness of WTC7 on many occasions, most recently in the post, Video of the Day – 60 Minutes Explores the Saudi Links to 9/11 Attacks:

      Here’s an excerpt:

      Of course, many other questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks remain unanswered. For example, I still haven’t seen a convincing explanation for how a 47-story tower that wasn’t hit by a plane imploded on itself.

      The very serious experts tell us that WTC7 collapsed due to fires caused by debris from the collapse of the nearby North Tower of the World Trade Center. So not only are we supposed to believe a massive office building came down demolition style without being hit by a plane, here’s the real kicker. A study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) admits that the collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires.

      Now here’s an explanation of why I think the 28 pages are important, even though I agree they are just the tip of the iceberg. From the post, Additional Evidence Emerges That U.S. Government Officials Intentionally Whitewashed the Saudi Role in 9/11:

      Critics of my repeated focus on highlighting the Saudi role in 9/11 claim that anything revealed in the “28 pages” will be marginal at best, leaving many of the most important questions surrounding the attacks shrouded in secrecy. I agree. What I disagree with is the conclusion that aggressively pursuing a declassification of the 28 pages is therefore meaningless.

      The reason I believe the “28 pages” are so important is because it unquestionably demonstrates that senior members of the U.S. government care more about the public perception of Saudi Arabia, and protecting its terrorist spawn, than cares about the public interest.

      The first step to understanding is to open people’s minds. People who are asleep to reality often need an event to wake them up, which will them lead to further explore the rabbit hole. My goal is to open people’s minds and then let them come to their own conclusions on things such as 9/11, an event to which we still have very little truth.

    • You make a good point that this may open some peoples minds to questioning but who have resisted the idea that 9/11/2001 was a criminal conspiracy of the greatest magnitude. But for those of us who have seen the official narrative as an outrageous lie for quite some time this release is mostly an extreme irritation that the authorities would think this distraction will be taken as a final word on the matter, which I believe this is meant to be for the authorities, who will point to this document and say it all ends here.

    • Yes, but those of us who already acknowledge that the official 9/11 narrative is a fairytale of the highest order have a very vested interest in opening other people’s minds to it.

      I think these 28-pages are a very good vehicle for doing so. They are very disturbing even if they don’t give us many answers.

    • Yes, I completely agree with all, it IS progress in ways that perhaps TPTB don’t actually understand in terms of the opening of more eyes to Government deceit and evil. WTC7 is definitely the smoking gun and despite a body of highly credible evidence from respected experts (including engineers and architects) that it was definitely a controlled demolition, neither Gubmin nor its presstitutes will allow even a mention of this in polite company.

  3. The Pentagon has massive air defense capability turned off by Cheney
    on 9/11. Mineta testimony to 9/11 investigation. Pentagon hit by missile
    fired from plane flew over Pentagon.

  4. OPPORTUNITY: 9/11 War Games
    Cheney was managing multiple war games and terror drills on 9/11 that paralyzed U.S. Air Force response.

    In May of 2001 Dick Cheney was placed directly in charge of managing the “seamless integration” of all training exercises throughout the federal government and military agencies by presidential mandate.

    The morning of 9/11 began with multiple training exercises of war games and terror drills which Cheney, as mandated by the president, was placed in charge of managing.

    War games & terror drills included live-fly exercises with military aircraft posing as hijacked aircraft over the United States, as well as simulated exercises that placed “false blips” (radar injects indicating virtual planes) on FAA radar screens. One exercise titled NORTHERN VIGILANCE pulled Air Force fighters up into Canada simulating a Russian air attack, so there were very few fighters remaining on the east coast to respond. All of this paralyzed Air Force response ensuring that fighter jocks couldn’t stop 9/11.

    An unknown individual or command center referred to by Major Don Arias of NORAD as the “maestro” coordinated the war games. It is possible there was more than one maestro, but no one will name names. FTW has asked this question of everyone in relevant government and military positions, to no avail. Our investigation has found the maestro was either Dick Cheney, General Ralph “Ed” Eberhart, or both.

    Whoever was coordinating the Air Force war games was under the management and direction of Dick Cheney, who was also in charge of managing a terror drill being set up on the West Side of downtown New York on 9/11 titled Tripod 2. This exercise set up a command and control center on 9/11 that was configured exactly like the one lost that morning in WTC 7. It was the perfect command center to respond to the crisis, and it was under Dick Cheney’s management before the hijackings occurred. How convenient.

    Dick Cheney was one of the main government officials deciding that such extensive war games would take place on 9/11. This was when American intelligence had collected dozens of warnings from governments and intelligence agencies indicating that terrorists were planning to hijack civilian aircraft and crash them into American targets on the ground during the week of September 9th, 2001.

    Preceding from ‘Crossing the Rubicon

    The problem with the post is, short attention span people who do not read comments (many readers do not read comments) might be left with the impression the USA ‘official’ stance is correct; i.e. ‘the Saudis did it.’ That is precisely the impression the social psychologists at Langley, Virginia would prefer readers take with them on exit…

    • When I say the the USA ‘official’ stance, I refer to the actual impressions intended by the release of the 28 pages, as opposed to the noise coming from those many in government denying any ‘the Saudis did it’ conclusion. PSYOPS is clearly the vehicle behind the release of the 28 pages as 911 narrative has been unwinding in the public psyche. Better ‘the Saudis did it’ in the public mind than Dick Cheney rolling out the red carpet from the point of view of the Doug Coe cult –

    • All valid points. I might add that the Pentagon also has a missile defense system which was not activated to bring down the incoming “airliner” or “whatever” blew the hole into that building, murdering those working there. The authorities narrative tells of the tracking by radar of the approaching “airliner from many miles out. I can’t remember the exact distance when first alert was given, not that it really matters as it all is a fallacy.

  5. Michael, interested in your thoughts why the “dancing israelis” were arrested, then released then went back to israel and said (on israeli tv), they were there to “document the event”? Anyone remember Kissinger’s name being pushed/pulled to head the 911 Commission? Even the commish members said the report was a whitewash. They didn’t even bother to mention Bldg 7. No mention of nano thermite being used in the demolition. See AE911TRUTH for details.. I could go on, but I think it’s pointless.

    • When you say it’s pointless, that’s how I feel about obsessing over the event as far as spending countless hours trying piece together what specifically happened.

      All I know is the entire official story is a heaping pile of crap. My number one goal with 9/11 is to convince people of that, as opposed to trying to convince them I know exactly what happened, because I don’t. If people can be convinced the U.S. government lied about 9/11 then there is nothing the U.S. government wouldn’t lie about, and once people accept this fact I think they will be critical, thinking citizens from that point forward. On all topics.

    • “….as opposed to trying to convince them I know exactly what happened, because I don’t.”

      I think that’s one of the mistakes that the 9/11 truth movement made (and I have been as guilty as anyone).

      We all know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the official story is “a heaping pile of crap”. The problem is that when speaking to non-truthers, the inevitable question arises, “Well what do you think happened?”. We then get sucked into defending our ‘theory’ instead of getting them to explain and prove how the the official story (or stories) could ever hope to be accurate.

      I agree with BRF’s view (and I think, for the most part, Michael does too) but just getting most people to accept that the official story has been a complete lie is an uphill struggle, Their view needs to change before we have any hope of getting them to consider the more painful truths lurking deeper down the rabbit hole. This report is an important first step. Whether it has any effect on the “I don’t want to know.” crowd is yet to be seen.

      I live in hope but……

  6. Keep in mind that the jet that hit the pentagon hit the almost vacant wedge. We were waiting to relocate back to the pentagon and were scheduled to do so in the spring of 2001. The delay in doing so was that the computer systems were not certified for operational use. Had that wedge been operational 3500 more people would have been killed. The 911 narrative is full of holes.

  7. I found the exchange between the readers and the author of this article as good as the article itself.

    My initial post was going to be to remind everyone that our air defense system was essentially ordered to stand down. But, I think the way it was covered in a response by Mr. West was much more detailed than what I had to say.

    But one detail about this story still bothers me. I would like to note that General Richard Myers was acting Joint Chief during 911. And previous to this was commander of NORAD from 98′ – 2000. Instead of being in his office at the Pentagon during the attack, he was on Capitol Hill. The actual Joint Chief, General Hugh Shelton, was flying to Europe during this time.

    And later, Gen. Myers being promoted to actual Joint Chief he served under Bush/Cheney and was Bush’s and Rumsfeld’s chief military advisor. He was involved with the planning and invasion of Iraq. And as all of you know by now, there we no WMDs in Iraq. So how does this guy end up at Capitol Hill on the morning of 911? And then how does he get duped into supporting a war that so obviously was conducted under false pretense? Or in fact was he told not to be in the Pentagon that morning. And was he fully aware of the bad intelligence held against Iraq? Seems to me Gen. Myers has some answering to do with regards to exactly what he knew prior to 911 and the subsequent invasion of Iraq.

    So whatever the answers are to my questions along with understanding the relationship between Gen. Myers and Cheney should get us a little closer to understanding the “how” of this story. Seems to me, someone as smart as n Air Force general in command of NORAD would know how to advise Cheney on exactly what to do to create a situation where the Air Force would be unable to respond to 4 hijacked airliners. 4 airliners that Condoleza Rice and company had no idea would ever be used to be crashed into buildings.

    Yes these pages are a step in the right direction. But the complicity of the people involved and subsequent war makes Gen Smedley Butler’s, “War is a Racket” speech sound a little underplayed. And when you start adding up the connections to the military contracts and Cheney’s gorgeously orchestrated no-bid contracts for Haliburton’s KRB to build bases in Iraq, we have what basically boils down to a villain from a Bond film.

    • The questions you raise on the military command on 9/11/2001 are important ones among the myriad of others that have never been answered. The big one that points to 9/11/2001 being a soft coup d’etat I believe was the invocation by Cheney on the morning of from the White House bunker of the Continuity of Government Act (COG). This Act, under emergency stipulations, suspends the American Constitution, in whole or part, as an unknown, for a period not to exceed six months. This declaration by Cheney has been extended by executive order as far as anyone knows ever since. Congress has on many occasions over the years asked the executive branch, including the Obama administration which on at least one occasion did extend COG, if COG was still in effect. To my knowledge Congress has never received a reply to their inquiries and seems to have for some time now given up on trying to get a definitive answer. The question being is if the American Constitution is in full or partial effect and which sections, in whole or part are in abeyance? Or if Congress is in effect a legitimate branch of government or entirely redundant? Or what we may be seeing in Washington may be Kabuki Theater meant to keep the citizens ignorant of the actual legislative reality, but very obvious with the unconstitutionality of the Patriot Act, various NDAA legislatIve sections and the rise of the FISA court system et al.

      WMD, nerve and other gases, were found in several large warehouses in Iraq. This fact was kept under wrap of security protocols as the supplier of these weapons was the American government through its agencies. This was never reported on as this information was a ‘leak’ coming from someone within the removal detail, either civilian or military. But of course weapons or not this aggression was long in the planning before the 9/11/2001 event was enacted as the catalyst.

Leave a Reply