Trademark Terrorism: Hotel Chain Sends Cease and Desist Letter to 1,000-Year-Old Village for Using its Own Name

Screen Shot 2015-05-06 at 4.34.16 PM

In one of the most embarrassing cases I’ve ever seen of corporate overreach, Copthorne Hotels sent a cease and desist letter to a village that has used its name for almost a millennium, claiming the tiny hamlet of 5,000 was infringing on its trademark. I wish I was making this up.

TechDirt covered this story and explained that:

Techdirt has covered its fair share of idiotic legal threats over trademarks, but the following example is spectacular even for a field that has many superb examples of corporate bullying. It concerns the village of Copthorne (population 5,000), in the English county of West Sussex. It’s rather well established: it’s been around for a thousand years, and is mentioned in the Domesday Book, which was compiled in 1086. Recently, though, its village association was threatened with legal action for using the name ‘Copthorne’ on its Web site.

Now here’s the actual letter, courtesy of the Plymouth Herald:

Dear Website Owner,

We act on behalf of our affiliate, Millennium & Copthorne International Limited (Company Registration No: 199600354R), a company incorporated in Singapore with its principal place of business at 390 Havelock Road, #02-01 King’s Centre, Singapore 169662 (“MCIL”).

MCIL holds the registrations of a number of well-known trademarks in the hospitality industry, including, inter alia, the “Millennium” and “Copthorne” brands. As you no doubt are aware, these trademarks, among others, are used to identify, advertise and promote products and services provided by Millennium Hotels & Resorts and, as such, have developed substantial goodwill and reputation around the world.

It has come to our attention that you have registered, without MCIL’s permission or authorization, the domain name [copthornevillage.org], which includes a protected trademark of MCIL. This unauthorized use of MCIL’s intellectual property falsely suggests MCIL’s association with or endorsement of your website and is likely to cause confusion in the minds of the public that the website is associated with or connected to MCIL and the products and services offered by Millennium Hotels & Resorts. As a result, substantial damage is likely to occur to the goodwill and reputation of these trademarks.

We require that you immediately disable all content hosted at copthornevillage.org and allow the domain name to expire. Please confirm by return that you have done so within five (5) working days of the date of this letter.

MCIL reserves all rights to take any further action to protect its intellectual property. 

Fortunately, this saga ended the right way. We learn that:

The association panicked and removed its website and informed the Copthorne Fairway Infant School and the local stores of the threat.

It then replied with a strongly-worded letter pointing out the village has existed for more than 900 years and was mentioned in the Domesday Book that was completed in 1086.

The brand protection team emailed the group on Monday last week apologising for any inconvenience and said it was sent in error and the association quickly its website.

Millennium and Copthorne communications advisor Peter Krijgsman said: “I can now confirm the ‘cease and desist’ letter sent to the Copthorne Village Association was sent in error in the course of an exercise carried out by Mark Monitor, a brand monitoring/protection agency.

“Mark Monitor will be contacting the administrator of the Copthorne Village Association website to explain this and to apologise for any inconvenience.”

You can expect a lot more of this if the Trans-Pacific Partnership gets through Congress with its ISDS system and the intentional erosion of national and local sovereignty. As noted recently in the post, Meet Cyber P3 – The U.S. Military’s Public-Private Partnership to Create Corporate/Government “Cyber Soldiers”:

Another example of a public-private screw job is the current push to “fast track” the Trans Pacific Partnership, or TPP. While it’s marketed as a free trade deal to appeal to the ignorant masses, at its core is a voluntary ceding of government sovereignty to the interests of multi-national corporations via the Investor-State Dispute Settlement system. The Washington Post covered this last month and described ISDSs as:

ISDS, or Investor-State Dispute Settlement, is the international system whereby multinational corporations (MNCs) can sue the governments of countries in which they invest for violating their property rights. International treaties give MNCs access to ISDS, under which ad hoc international tribunals decide whether or not an MNC deserves compensation. There is no appeals system in place.

This isn’t about free trade, it is about protecting multi-national corporations from changes made down the road by governments after the plebs realize how completely sold out they have been. Moreover, you know something is truly evil when there is a complete media blackout on the topic.

Prepare to submit to your corporate-statist overlords:

Screen Shot 2015-05-06 at 4.55.56 PM

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

5 thoughts on “Trademark Terrorism: Hotel Chain Sends Cease and Desist Letter to 1,000-Year-Old Village for Using its Own Name”

  1. If a trademark works the way I think it works…the corporation must relinquish their trademark of that name since that name was already in public use – which is documented.

    If they do not have to give up the trademark, then I suspect I’ll be rushing out to buy trademarks named ‘Italy’, ‘USA’, ‘Nato’,’Germany’, ‘France’ and many others. Once in place I would be able to use this corporate case as precedent to compel those entities using the fresh trademarks to stop using the trademark or fork over cash… 😀

    Reply
  2. All according to plan. To bring in a Hunger Games/ Agenda 21 society where the elites and their insider coporations own everything it is necessary to strip everyone else of their ownership rights. To do this they are trying to greatly expand the trademark and copy rights so that way you can pay and never own. This is what the TPP, TTIP, etc. are really about. They are greatly expanding the power of copyrights so that they can shut down the free flow of information on the web and clkaim ownership over EVERYTHING via copyrights.

    For example, you have a car that you think you own but if the powers that shouldn’t be decide to to remotely turn off the car on you for ANY reason they can do it and there is nothing you can do about it. Meanwhile the car is spying on you, reporting all of your driving mistakes so that you can be sent a ticket for every time you go over the speed limit AND have your insurance rates raised. Needless to say, you have NO access to this information as it is only there to be used against you. You couldn’t use it to prove that you couldn’t have commited a crime because you weren’t there.

    Reply

Leave a Reply