ECB’s First Chief Economist Warns – The EU is a ‘House of Cards’

screen-shot-2016-10-17-at-1-05-21-pm

None of the following about the EU will come as a surprise to most of you, but the language used by Otmar Issing is nevertheless pretty remarkable.

The Telegraph reports:

The European Central Bank is becoming dangerously over-extended and the whole euro project is unworkable in its current form, the founding architect of the monetary union has warned.

“One day, the house of cards will collapse,” said Professor Otmar Issing, the ECB’s first chief economist and a towering figure in the construction of the single currency.

Prof Issing said the euro has been betrayed by politics, lamenting that the experiment went wrong from the beginning and has since degenerated into a fiscal free-for-all that once again masks the festering pathologies.

“Realistically, it will be a case of muddling through, struggling from one crisis to the next. It is difficult to forecast how long this will continue for, but it cannot go on endlessly,” he told the journal Central Banking in a remarkable deconstruction of the project.

The regime is almost certain to be tested again in the next global downturn, this time starting with higher levels of debt and unemployment, and greater political fatigue.

Prof Issing lambasted the European Commission as a creature of political forces that has given up trying to enforce the rules in any meaningful way. “The moral hazard is overwhelming,” he said.  

The ECB has “crossed the Rubicon” and is now in an untenable position, trying to reconcile conflicting roles as banking regulator, Troika enforcer in rescue missions and agent of monetary policy. Its own financial integrity is increasingly in jeopardy.

The central bank already holds over €1 trillion of bonds bought at “artificially low” or negative yields, implying huge paper losses once interest rates rise again. “An exit from the QE policy is more and more difficult, as the consequences potentially could be disastrous,” he said.

“The decline in the quality of eligible collateral is a grave problem. The ECB is now buying corporate bonds that are close to junk, and the haircuts can barely deal with a one-notch credit downgrade. The reputational risk of such actions by a central bank would have been unthinkable in the past,” he said.

Prof Issing slammed the first Greek rescue in 2010 as little more than a bailout for German and French banks, insisting that it would have been far better to eject Greece from the euro as a salutary lesson for all. The Greeks should have been offered generous support, but only after it had restored exchange rate viability by returning to the drachma.

Indeed, as I highlighted in last year’s post: German Study Proves It – 95% of Greek “Bailout” Money Went to the Banks.

Jacques Delors, the euro’s “political” founding father, issued his own candid post-mortem last month on the failings of EMU but disagrees starkly with Prof Issing about the nature of the problem.

His foundation calls for a supranational economic government with debt pooling and an EU treasury, as well as expansionary policies to break out of the “vicious circle” and prevent a second Lost Decade.

The fact that some are actively considering this in the wake of all the populist movements tells on the continent, tells you just how disconnected many of these people are.

“It is essential and urgent: at some point in the future, Europe will be hit by a new economic crisis. We do not know whether this will be in six weeks, six months or six years. But in its current set-up the euro is unlikely to survive that coming crisis,” said the Delors report.

Prof Issing is not a German nationalist. He is open to the idea of a genuine United States of Europe built on proper foundations, but has warned repeatedly against trying to force the pace of integration, or to achieve federalism “by the back door“.

He decries the latest EU plan for a “fiscal entity” in the Five Presidents’ Report, fearing that such move would lead to a rogue plenipotentiary with unbridled powers over sensitive issues of national life, beyond democratic accountability.

Such a system would erode the budgetary sovereignty of the member states and violate the principle of no taxation without representation, forgetting the lessons of the English Civil War and the American Revolution.

Of course, since most EU technocrats have virtually no capacity for introspection, there’s close to a zero percent chance they’ll do the right thing. Therefore, as I laid out in the post, It’s Not Just the UK – Widespread Support for EU Referendums Seen Across the Continent, here’s how I see things playing out:

  1. Euro skepticism is on the rise.
  2. EU technocrats will fight back with sticks instead of carrots, furthering euro-skepticism.
  3. Great Britain will be the first, but probably not the last country to hold an EU referendum over the next 5-10 years.
  4. The EU as it stands is a failed experiment. This is proven by the inept and corrupt handling of both the Greek “bailout” program and the refugee crisis.
  5. The only solution is to increase decentralization and restore national democracy within the framework of some of the popular attributes the EU offers.
  6. EU technocrats are obsessed with a further centralization of power and will continue to push it against the will of the people.
  7. The EU will ultimately disintegrate as a result of overwhelming popular dissent to technocratic scheming and incompetence.

For related articles, see:

German Study Proves It – 95% of Greek “Bailout” Money Went to the Banks

Does the Migrant Crisis Represent the End of the European Union?

Video of the Day – Here’s What Happened When a Member of European Parliament Tried to Read the TTIP Text

The EU Wants to Impose a Tax for Sharing Links on the Internet

Head of the European Parliament Warns – EU at Risk of Falling Apart

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

2 thoughts on “ECB’s First Chief Economist Warns – The EU is a ‘House of Cards’”

  1. When one reads facts like these…one can honestly reflect upon the whole Rothchild and Illuminatti traits that have very sinister modes of operations throughout history. Scholars more knowledgeable about threads in successful take downs with those evil people involved would likely ascertain with certainty that there is some faction working all over the world causing acceleration of these events.

    Reply
  2. A unified Europe and world is actually an inspiration from good and it is the task of our times to move beyond blood bound relationships and form new ones which are independent of national, racial or religious bonds. The inspiration was hijacked by certain brotherhoods who use it for their own purposes, that is clear to see. The problem is the public, or at least a large part of it, is not even aware of such an inspiration, so of course those that know what is to be for humanity, who are members of dark brotherhoods, will exploit the situation and use it for their own egotistical purpose’s. Ignorance is not bliss and being so does not make one innocent. people sow their ignorance and lack of care and will reap in times to come when evil will be stronger and there wont be the freedoms that we take for granted today. The problem with mankind is he has become extremely selfish. He either cares too much about himself, his close friends and family, and/or nation and doesn’t give a thought to other countries and their inhabitants. The truth is there are 100 times more people with hatred than love and this is the real reason why things in society are getting worse. Even a 6 year old child can realise that only love can prevent wars and a decline in society. And if we want to be completely honest here, British people didn’t form a proper relationship with the rest of Europe since the E.U was formed, because if it did it would seek to do what is best for not only it’s self, but also the other countries in the Union who are also affected in the same or a similar way. Philosophers from preceding centuries have prophesised the decline of western culture. They have prophesied that the last remaining white Europeans will be mostly in central and eastern Europe. They have also said that nationalism has been an issue in the 19th and 20th century and have said how regressive and destructive it is. And here we are in the 21st century where nationalism is resurfacing again. You can call it sovereignty and democracy until the cows come home, but it is nationalism clothed in words such as sovereignty and democracy. Just look around Europe, America too, and you will see nationalistic thoughts and feelings growing in higher and higher number’s. In my opinion I think nationalism will be the icing on the cake for another world war. Just like in the build up to previous world wars there was a financial crisis, a false enemy to spread hatred, and nationalism. These are the three ingredients needed for a world war, so if people truly believe that returning back to nationalism and perceiving Europe and the E.U as their enemy, and believing that countries will become more prosperous by looking out only for their own national interests then they need to relearn history and learn about the future, because politicians and the media have fooled them. I agree that a forced unification is unacceptable, but a large proportion of people do not even will unification from their heart, because they are selfish and only care about themselves, their close friends and family, and/or nation. If it was willed and wanted then there wouldn’t be any fascists exploiting an inspiration which was given from heaven.

    Reply

Leave a Reply