Must Read of the Day – ‘The Real Deplorables’

screen-shot-2016-10-10-at-4-23-45-pm

Below are some excerpts from Michael Tracey’s latest article: The Real Deplorables.

Enjoy.

The real “deplorables” generally aren’t the people whom Hillary denounced as wholly “irredeemable,” or at whom economically secure commentators fulminate on a regular basis. More obviously “deplorable” are Hillary’s fellow financial, political, economic, and military elites who wrecked the economy, got us mired in endless unwinnable foreign wars, and erected a virtually impenetrable cultural barrier between everyday Americans trying to live fruitful lives and their pretentious, well-heeled superiors ensconced in select coastal enclaves. It is thanks to the actions of this “basket of deplorables” that we’re in the situation we’re in, where an oaf like Trump is perilously close to seizing the presidency.

At a recent Trump rally in Lancaster County, Pa., I was bemused to encounter a coterie of local Amish people who’d traveled there together by bus. Asked why they backed Trump, the overwhelming response was that Amish folks just wanted to preserve their traditional way of life (which they saw as under siege) and perceived Trump as enabling them to carry on with it. Some told me they supported Trump not because of some overweening disdain for their nation’s fellowmen, or immigrants, or even coastal liberals, but because they felt that the federal government was intruding on their ability to properly run their small farms. 

One Amish gentleman, remarking on Trump’s apparent lack of strident religious belief, added of Trump: “He’s not a Christian, but he’ll protect the Christian cause.” Veteran religion reporter Bob Smietana later remarked that he could not recall a previous instance of Amish people showing up en masse to a presidential campaign event.

Naturally, upon tweeting photos from the rally, I was inundated with indignant cries from ostensible liberals claiming that the people in question weren’t real Amish, or were desperately deluded, or similar snark. True: the Amish lifestyle isn’t for everybody. Nor do the Amish foist it on anyone else. One virtue of the United States is that it’s a huge, pluralistic democratic republic with lots of land and lots of room for people to practice their beliefs as they see fit.

You don’t necessarily have to love these peculiar belief systems to tolerate their existence. Indeed, some of them undoubtedly contain facets that are bigoted and/or vulgar, and you are free to vociferously criticize them. Some even might be cut off from popular culture, as is the case with the Amish, who certainly are not attuned to the daily outrage avalanche dished out by mainstream-media organs—but this doesn’t mean that the people who practice old-fashioned lifestyles are somehow morally sullied or “deplorable.” It means they have different life trajectories.

This also holds true in Lewiston, Maine, where Trump is favored to win the 2nd Congressional District and therefore at least one (potentially crucial) electoral vote. (Maine and Nebraska allocate their electoral votes by congressional district.) Lots of Franco-Americans populate this area, and many old-timers still speak French with a distinctive Central Mainer dialect. (Often it comes out when folks get inebriated at the bars in town.) When I visited recently, everyone basically had the same story: mills use to be the lifeblood of the local economy and by extension its civic institutions. Once the mills inexplicably shuttered, these workers lost their sense of location and community. Social-club memberships dwindled; parades and marches down the main thoroughfare became less of an attraction. There’s just not a hell of a lot going on nowadays, except Patriots games on TV, drinking, and drugs. Anybody with the means usually either bolts for relatively more prosperous Bangor to the north, or south to Boston and beyond.

Are the people who live in Lewiston really “deplorables”? Most of them like Trump, but they’re not the ones who crashed the economy or agitated to invade Iraq, as Hillary did.

Again: perhaps the true deplorables are the unaccountable elites whose decisions directly worsened life for millions of Americans. Oddly, you never hear Hillary running around to high-roller fundraisers condemning Goldman Sachs for their deplorable conduct; maybe that’s because they’ve directly given her and Bill hundreds of thousands of dollars for “speeches,” excerpts of which finally came out last Friday and are just as degenerate as you’d expect. (Goldman banned partners from giving money to Trump’s campaign, but handing over cash to Hillary is still perfectly fine.)

Maybe the Amish of southeast Pennsylvania or the Franco-Americans of central Maine don’t use the correct Twitter hashtags or subscribe to Lena Dunham’s newsletter, but they’re still good people with normal ambitions for a happy, secure life. Screeching “deplorable!” at them is itself deplorable, especially because it lets the elites who bungled the country’s affairs off the hook.

Read the entire piece here: The Real Deplorables.

You should also follow Michael Tracey on Twitter, his account is one of the best.

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

3 thoughts on “Must Read of the Day – ‘The Real Deplorables’”

  1. Why would you call Trump an “oaf”? It takes smarts to become a billionaire and run a world-wide business. He knows how to make decisions and tough ones at that. Hillary only knows how to cover her butt and lie continuously. Give me a businessman any day over her demonically inspired global vision of tyranny.

    Reply
  2. Hate to burst your bubble but Trump owes out 650 million dollars in personal loans, owed to mostly China and Russia. In the event your hearing aids are not working, Trump has glorified and praised Vladimir Putan on many occasions. If you owe millions to 3rd world countries, why would you trash talk them in front of the public, when you know your not going to do a single thing to them? You must be one of the brainwashed Trump supporters? Anyway, to enlighten you a bit, this man is highly in debt, and he knows his properties now have “legal secure judgements” against them til these loans are paid off, his business’s are suffering in the worse way and contracts cancelled after they heard his mouth and his bashing of minorities and women. Trump has many contracts from Saudi Arabia cancelled when they heard he bashed Muslims, he has gone bankrupt 6 times, screwed countless employees, not once has he ever assisted the working man/woman during his lifetime, and all of a sudden he is the “champion of the working man”. Trump is for Trump, refuses to turn over his Income taxes which would tell us all the truth, and continues to refuse same to the bitter end. Now, after he tried to embarrass Bill Clinton at the last debate, his past comes out to haunt him, now he tries to threaten everybody to stop the bleeding per say to include the NY Times for publishing his embarrassing bus predator trash talk.
    My response to you is, you must be one of the morons they speak about that believes every word this moron says! He turns everything that is he, then tries to make it look as if it’s the other person. During the last debate Trump was stalking Clinton, everybody noticed it, except of course the moron Trump supporters, then afterwards made claims that it was Clinton walking around or in front of him. Trump is in need of psychological assistance and you for following this creepy scary man!

    Reply
    • First of all, who the heck are you talking to? Neither I or the person who wrote this article are Trump supporters (stop making stuff up).

      From day 1 I have said I do not support either candidate. Is it so hard to actually critique the article written as opposed to making up personal attacks about people? Not an ok thing to do here in the comment section.

      Consider that a warning if you wish to participate here in the future.

Leave a Reply