Pentagon Refuses to Disclose How Many U.S. Troops Are Fighting ISIS

Screen Shot 2016-08-11 at 1.43.00 PM

The United States will deploy dozens of special operations forces to northern Syria to advise opposition forces in their fight against Islamic State, a major policy shift for President Barack Obama and a step he has long resisted to avoid getting dragged into another war in the Middle East.

Given this new “strategy,” if we can even call it that, I thought it’d be useful to share with readers the 16 times Obama has publicly promised over the last couple of years to not send ground forces into Syria.

From last year’s post: Obama Announces “Boots on the Ground” in Syria, Despite Promising “No Boots on the Ground” 16 Times

With American media once again singularly obsessed with the latest thing Donald Trump said, you might be surprised to find out that actual news is occurring.

What I’m referring to specifically is the latest incident of transparency flouting from the self-proclaimed “most transparent administration” ever. Namely, the U.S. military’s refusal to disclose how many American soldiers are engaged in combat against ISIS.

The Hill reports:

The Pentagon has declined to say how many U.S. troops are actually on the ground in Iraq and Syria more than two years after the first deployments to fight the Islamic State.

The military only shares the number of full-time troops deployed, known as the “force management level” or FML.

That figure is currently about 3,825 in Iraq and 300 in Syria, but the number of troops on the ground, including temporary deployments, is much higher.

There are an additional 800 to 900 U.S. troops and defense personnel temporarily deployed to Iraq, a figure that a defense official says “tends to run around.”

It’s unclear how many temporary troops are in Syria.

A Central Command spokesman acknowledged to The Hill that some troops that temporarily deploy aren’t counted. In some cases, that’s included senior officials on “personnel visits.” 

So kinda like the unemployment rate?

Some worry that officials are hiding the deepening U.S. involvement in the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

You don’t say.

The pressure for the Pentagon to release the actual troop numbers comes as the administration faces questions from both parties about the strategy to fight ISIS and with no signs Congress is close to a deal on a war authorization.

Who needs Congress when you can just do whatever the fuck you want.

The issue has been simmering for months. Defense officials have rejected repeated requests from reporters for the actual numbers.

“There’s been a decision made not to release that number,” Army Col. Steve Warren, a spokesman, told reporters on March 21. “The number that we release is our force management level… I don’t have a reason for not releasing this number other than it’s the orders that I’m under.” 

On Wednesday, a defense official again said the actual number won’t be made public, a decision from the office of the Defense Secretary and Centcom.

A spokesman for the Joint Chiefs said the number of troops deployed on a temporary basis can change widely day-to-day, and it would be too difficult to explain the numbers to the public. 

Well that’s a new one. The American public is too stupid to understand!

The current force management level is 3,825 in Iraq and 300 in Syria, There are 800 additional troops and personnel temporarily deployed to Iraq and another 100 U.S. troops at the Office of Security Cooperation in Baghdad, which technically falls under the State Department and is not counted.

And there are more troops on the way: The administration is deploying about 400 more troops to Iraq soon. The Pentagon room also has room to deploy an additional 422 troops at any time under caps set by President Obama.

Those deployments would bring the total number of troops in Iraq and Syria to 5,847 — well above the Pentagon’s publicly released force management level.

But even that number doesn’t include troops involved in the ISIS fight stationed elsewhere in the Middle East, outside of Iraq and Syria.

Centcom told The Hill on May 4 that there were 700 additional U.S. troops fighting ISIS in the region. But weeks later, Col. Warren publicly said the number was actually “several thousand others throughout the region and 1000s more back home.”

That also doesn’t include 1,605 American defense contractors in Iraq and an unknown number in Syria.

Call me a conspiracy theorist, but it sure sounds like they’re trying to hide something.

For now, there is no sign officials will be more forthcoming.

If you like your transparency, you can keep your transparency.

For related articles, see:

Obama Announces “Boots on the Ground” in Syria, Despite Promising “No Boots on the Ground” 16 Times

United States of Newspeak – Obama Calls Executive Orders “Presidential Memoranda” to Avoid Scrutiny and Issues Most in History

Obama’s ISIS War is Not Only Illegal, it Makes George W. Bush Look Like a Constitutional Scholar

The New York Times Describes Obama – “A Restless President Weary of the Obligations of the White House…”

Video of the Day – Obamacare Architect Credits “Lack of Transparency” and “Stupidity of the American People” for Passage of Healthcare Law

Further Details Emerge on the Epic U.S. Foreign Policy Disaster that is Syria

“Stop Thanking Me for My Service” – Former U.S. Army Ranger Blasts American Foreign Policy and The Corporate State

Afghan President Hamid Karzai Slams U.S. Foreign Policy in Farewell Speech

America’s Disastrous Foreign Policy – My Thoughts on Iraq

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

4 thoughts on “Pentagon Refuses to Disclose How Many U.S. Troops Are Fighting ISIS”

  1. Perhaps they have put the soldiers in Birkenstocks or tennis shoes for the moment of their deployment. That way The Gubmint can say ” we have not deployed any boots on the ground to (fill in the blank).” They just put on their boots once they are “in country.” Or, perhaps, they wear those little blue booties like they have in the hospital or clean room factories: that way their boots never “touch” the ground!

    Promises are to be kept and we can ALL trust Our Gubmint to Keep Its Promises!

    Reply
  2. In the future, the name Obama will be used in slang to refer to bullshitting: saying one thing and then not doing it, or doing the opposite. When someone does this, they’ll say he “Obama’d some folks.”

    Reply
  3. Yes. I know a hell of a lot people who got “Obama’d” 8 years ago despite my repeated warnings that he was/is a serial flip-flopper/con artist with very good and well learned NLP skills, courtesy of Tony Robbins.

    But the real dumbfucks are the ones who got Obama’d again in 2008. Those are the ones that I just had to ask if they were just that painfully stupid, or just masochistic, or both.

    It’s not hard to imagine the stories we will hear from the military brass about this clueless narcissistic clown puppet after he’s out of office.

    Reply
  4. well, it will not come from DOD … we don’t like telling the enemy anything…

    as to the other… he has never demonstrated any integrity … if you have no principles you can break your word at will… no principles no conscience to bother about…

    some people were raised with principles some were not… some people have integrity… some people never heard the word growing up… this just another broken promise… one of many… to those who supported him… you knew he was snake… so do cry when you are bit…

    Reply

Leave a Reply