MSNBC Host Admits Democratic Primary Rigged, While Station Simultaneously Rigs Coverage

Screen Shot 2016-03-17 at 3.08.44 PM

While it might sound strange, a coronation of Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary will mark the end of the party as we know it. There’s been a lot written about the “Sanders surge,” with much of it revolving around Hillary Clinton’s extreme personal weakness as a candidate. While this is indisputable, it’s also a convenient way for the status quo to exempt itself from fault and discount genuine grassroots anger. I’m of the view that Sanders’ support is more about people liking him than them disliking Hillary, particularly when it comes to registered Democrats. He’s not merely seen as the “least bad choice.” People really do like him.

The Sanders appeal is twofold. He is seen as unusually honest and consistent for someone who’s held elected office for much of his life, plus he advocates a refreshingly anti-establishment view on core issues that matter to an increasing number of Americans. These include militarism, Wall Street bailouts, a two-tiered justice system, the prohibitive cost of college education, healthcare insecurity and a “rigged economy.” While Hillary is being forced to pay lip service to these issues, everybody knows she doesn’t mean a word of it. She means it less than Obama meant it in 2008, and Obama really didn’t mean it.

– From the post: It’s Not Just the GOP – The Democratic Party is Also Imploding

I just finished watching a surprisingly good and honest 14 minute segment on MSNBC’s Morning Joe which covered how the Democratic National Committee has been rigging the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton. Host Joe Scarborough even went so far as to admit the media’s complicity in the process with regard to superdelegates. He notes:

“And I know the Republican party wishes they rigged the process as well as the Democratic party did right now, because they could rig it against Trump — but the Democratic party rigs their process so that these superdelegates, which by the way can move any direction they want, actually skew the process and the reporting so badly that the voters actually don’t have their say when it comes to voting.”

This is a key issue that has been driving me up a wall lately. It is journalistic malpractice for media outlets to include superdelegates in the total tally when these Democratic operatives can switch their support at any point between now and the convention. As we learned in the post Did Hillary Clinton Really Win More New Hampshire Delegates Than Sanders Despite a Landslide Loss?:

Q: From everything you’ve told me so far, I can’t understand why you’re calling Superdelegate votes “irrelevant.” It seems to me like they have the same voting power as a normal delegate, and this puts Sanders in a tremendous hole from the word “go.”

A: Here’s why it doesn’t matter: Superdelegates have never decided a Democratic nomination. It would be insane, even by the corrupt standards of the Democratic National Committee, if a small group of party elites went against the will of the people to choose the presidential nominee.

This has already been an incredibly tense election, and Sanders voters are already expressing their unwillingness to vote for Clinton in the general election. When you look at the astounding numbers from Iowa and New Hampshire, where more than 80 percent of young voters have chosen Sanders over Clinton, regardless of gender, it’s clear that Clinton already finds herself in a very tenuous position for the general election. It will be tough to motivate young supporters, but any hint that Bernie was screwed by the establishment will result in total abandonment.

Democrats win when turnout is high, and if the DNC decides to go against the will of the people and force Clinton down the electorate’s throat, they’d be committing political suicide.

The important thing to know here is that Superdelegates are merely pledged to a candidate. We know who they support because they’ve stated it publicly, or been asked by journalists. They are not committed, and can change at any time. If Bernie Sanders wins the popular vote, he will be the nominee. End of story.

I completely agree with this assessment, which is why the media plays the key role in rigging this thing for Hillary Clinton. For example, consider the following “political reporting” published by Bloomberg yesterday

Though Sanders picked up 55 delegates Saturday to Clinton’s 20, she still holds a commanding lead with 1,712 delegates of the 2,383 needed for a first-ballot nomination at the party’s national convention at Philadelphia in July. That includes 469 superdelegates—Democratic office-holders and party officials who aren’t bound by results from primaries and caucuses. Sanders has 1,004 total delegates.

The truth is she doesn’t actually “have” those superdelegates, and if Sanders wins the delegates people actually vote for, he’ll probably get the nomination. As such, the media invents a number that isn’t actually real, and definitely not set in stone, to demoralize Sanders supporters and make them think the gap is too large to overcome. It’s absolutely disgusting.

Now here’s CNBC doing the same thing:

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 3.23.10 PM

So given that Joe Scarborough alluded to this trick during his segment, you’d think the person in charge of graphics at MSNBC wouldn’t be so shameless. But you’d be wrong. This is how the station portrayed the race on several occasions during the segment:

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 10.10.43 AM

Here’s another example:

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 11.14.35 AM

Incredibly, the only graphic shown during the segment that even alluded to the fact that these numbers are inflated by superdelegates is the following:

Screen Shot 2016-03-29 at 11.09.41 AM

While better, the above still represents a completely dishonest portrayal of the race. This is the right way to do it, from the New York Times:

Screen Shot 2016-03-27 at 12.02.24 PM

If anything, superdelegates should be mentioned as a footnote only. Anything else represents a total lack of ethics, integrity and highlights why the public has nothing but derision for the American mainstream media.

The clip is still worth watching.

For related articles, see:

American Democracy – Allegations of Voter Suppression Emerge from the Arizona Primary

Rigged Democracy – Nearly 10% of Democratic Party Superdelegates are Lobbyists

DNC Head Threatens to Kick Michigan Mayor Out of Debate for Cheering Bernie Sanders

“Bernie or Bust” – Over 50,000 Sanders Supporters Pledge to Never Vote for Hillary

It’s Not Just the GOP – The Democratic Party is Also Imploding

Why Hillary Clinton Cannot Beat Donald Trump

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 1LefuVV2eCnW9VKjJGJzgZWa9vHg7Rc3r1

 Follow me on Twitter.


 Add your comment
  1. that’s what i’m talking about baby!. classic liberty blitzkreig i love it.

  2. I disagree that the final clip is still worth watching.

    I watched it. It was utterly revolting.

    Listening to clueless nincompoops, including heavily made-up and coifed women, reminded me of the tyranny of the high school social scene. Who do these idiots think they are, talking their mess about this and about that?

    If I want some wise analysis I go to Max Keiser or naked capitalism or the countless experienced analysts available now on the internet.

    Why on earth would I listen to fools wondering why they can’t figure out the most basics of any society? They can’t figure it out becuase they have always been the popular kids and never ever took a walk on the real side, where most people on planet earth live.

  3. The idea that because the parties don’t let the people alone vote for the candidates who will represent those two parties means that the system is rigged is nuts! The candidates will be representing the parties, two private, independent organizations. It may seem that the people should be putting their candidates in place for the nominations, but, and it may seem like a complete revelation to you, MOST PEOPLE ARE STUPID! You may remember the old line that you can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time, but OBAMA FOOLED MOST OF THE ELECTORATE TWICE. I do not and will not trust the American people to nominate the best person to be President EVER. The idiot Trump said that he wants to go back to the old way, where the people choose the nominee. That shows how much of a moron he really is. The ‘old way’ was where the people had absolutely no say and the party bosses chose the person whom they wanted to represent their party. That shows just how ignorant Trump really is, what a worthless waste of a bad haircut. The only people worse are Hillary and Sanders. Boy is this country screwed!

Leave a Reply