Number of NYC Apartments for Rent Above $50k/Month Triples Since ’08; 82% of U.S. Construction = Luxury Units

Screen Shot 2014-11-19 at 1.46.23 PM

Here is good news for the plutocrat who wants to try out Manhattan’s ritziest neighborhoods before taking the multimillion-dollar plunge. The market for super-high-end rentals is booming, with plenty of enticing options for tenants of every taste.

In all, 82 apartments renting for at least $50,000 a month were listed on StreetEasy during the first three months of the year, more than triple the number listed in the first quarter of 2008. At lower thresholds, luxury listings are also on the rise. Apartments renting for more than $25,000 a month made up 0.95 percent of total inventory in the first quarter of 2015, up from 0.46 percent in the first quarter of 2008…

Of 370,000 multifamily rental units completed from 2012 to 2014 in 54 U.S. metropolitan areas, 82% were in the luxury category, according to CoStar Group Inc., a real-estate research firm. The firm defines luxury buildings as those that command rents in the top 20% of the market. In some places, including Denver, Tampa, Baltimore and Phoenix, virtually all new apartment construction has been targeted to high-end renters. In Atlanta, about 95% of new apartments have been in the luxury category.

– From Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal:

The oligarch recovery marches forward with reckless enthusiasm, despite extremely disturbing underlying trends which are all but guaranteed to result in significant societal unrest in the years ahead. The U.S. economy, and indeed the global economy, is much more similar to pre-1789 France than any other historical period I can think of.

You have a handful of super wealthy people, completely disconnected from any sense of reality, running around telling governments what to do. All the same characters who created the global financial crisis remain in charge of the world’s most powerful institutions, and continue to benefit handsomely from its aftermath. While claiming to have “saved the global economy,” the only things they really saved were their own positions of power and wealth. The only thing that was saved, was the very thing that should have been completely discarded, the global status quo. 

The results of the global bailouts and backstops are now clear for everyone to witness. The entire global economy is one gigantic ongoing crime scene. It’s an economy in which fraud is rewarded and never punished. An economy where the rich, powerful and connected concoct unimaginably lucrative crony deals knowing the law doesn’t apply to them. To hedge their corruption, they feed scraps to the poor, not out of altruism, but so that the growing underclasses have just enough not to rebel.

Today, I want to highlight two related articles to clearly demonstrate just how completely screwed up the U.S. economy really is. The first one is courtesy of Bloomberg, and focuses on my hometown of NYC. The best decision I ever made in my life was leaving that place, and it’s gotten much, much more narcissistic and financialized since I left (for the story of why I left, see: The Biggest Trade of My Life). The second article is from the Wall Street Journal, and it highlights the extremely troubling statistic that 82% of multifamily rental units completed from 2012 to 2014 in 54 U.S. metropolitan areas were luxury units.

First, from Bloomberg:

Here is good news for the plutocrat who wants to try out Manhattan’s ritziest neighborhoods before taking the multimillion-dollar plunge. The market for super-high-end rentals is booming, with plenty of enticing options for tenants of every taste.

In all, 82 apartments renting for at least $50,000 a month were listed on StreetEasy during the first three months of the year, more than triple the number listed in the first quarter of 2008. At lower thresholds, luxury listings are also on the rise. Apartments renting for more than $25,000 a month made up 0.95 percent of total inventory in the first quarter of 2015, up from 0.46 percent in the first quarter of 2008. Real estate agents and wealth managers say the increase in expensive rentals is partly an outgrowth of the luxury building boom sweeping through New York City and partly due to the shifting whims of a global elite that wants luxury digs without the hassle of a long-term commitment. 

The hot market for super-luxury apartments has spurred new high-end projects. Spending on residential construction increased 73 percent in 2014 from the year before, according to the New York Building Congress, but the number of new units increased by only 11 percent. That means fewer resources for more-affordable housing. “The existence of a greater share of pricey buildings implies that the lower end isn’t growing as quickly,” said Alan Lightfeldt, data scientist at StreetEasy.

In some cases, it’s the very demand for luxury real estate that’s providing supply to the rental market. As the global elite hit on Manhattan condos as a store of wealth, buyers are more likely to become landlords. Last year, condo buyers were twice as likely to rent their apartments out within 60 days of buying them as they were in 2010, according to a Bloomberg story in February.

“The question might not be how rich do you have to be—it might be how foolish,” says Michael Goodman, chief executive of Wealthstream Advisors. “It’s like, why do you buy a $250,000 car? Not because it gets good gas mileage, but because you want to, and you can.”

While the above article points out that most of the construction in NYC targets the very wealthy, what about trends across the U.S. as a whole? For that, we turn to the WSJ:

Of 370,000 multifamily rental units completed from 2012 to 2014 in 54 U.S. metropolitan areas, 82% were in the luxury category, according to CoStar Group Inc., a real-estate research firm. The firm defines luxury buildings as those that command rents in the top 20% of the market. In some places, including Denver, Tampa, Baltimore and Phoenix, virtually all new apartment construction has been targeted to high-end renters. In Atlanta, about 95% of new apartments have been in the luxury category.

“I don’t believe there ever has been a time where we have produced so much luxury rental housing,” said Susan Wachter, professor of real estate at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. While these new buildings are priced for the affluent, many middle-class and young workers are straining to rent the units, in part because they have few others choices.

What’s more, rents in new apartment buildings are commanding a far bigger premium over older buildings than during past construction booms. According to MPF Research, a division of RealPage Inc., apartments completed a decade ago on average commanded rents that were 9% higher than older buildings. But new apartments delivered since 2010 have fetched a 21% premium over existing rental stock. In the Atlanta area, the premium for a new apartment is 39% compared with 2% a decade ago.

While some developers worry that the current construction boom could eventually result in overbuilding at the high-end—which could put downward pressure on rents for all types of apartments—there is considerable angst among city officials and housing advocates worried that the middle class is getting squeezed.

What’s the middle class? But don’t worry, there’s hope…

Some cities, such as New York, are moving to require that new developments in some areas include more units for middle- and low-income families.

I suppose after deliberately handing out subsidies to oligarchs, the serfs could use a few scraps. Let’s not forget: Tax Breaks for Oligarchs – The $100 Million Manhattan Apartment with a Property Tax Rate of 0.017%

Mr. Randall, owner of privately-held South City Partners, said when he started 30 years ago “almost 100%” of what he built was low-rise, suburban buildings with rents of about $1,000 a month in today’s dollars. Now, even as his business has shifted almost entirely to urban projects like Inman Quarter, he fears the supply of new high-end building could be overdone. 

As a hedge, he’s in the process of purchasing two sites in suburbs of Atlanta where he hopes to return to building apartments for about $1,200 a month on average. He said the challenges are steep because suburban communities often oppose multifamily projects and banks aren’t anxious to finance middle-market projects.

Ah the banks. The taxpayers bailed them out so that they could turn around and steal billions by criminally rigging the financial markets, yet they can’t be bothered to finance projects for the middle class.

The reason everything is being built for the wealthy, is because all the gains from the oligarch recovery have gone to the wealthy. This is no accident. It’s how the bailouts were designed, and how the status quo operates. Our socio-economic system since 2008 can be best described as serfdom, and nothing is going to change until people admit this, rather than hanging on to false hopes that they one day too will become an oligarch. It’s not gonna happen.

For related articles, see:

Just Another Tale from the Oligarch Recovery – $100 Million Homes Being Built on Spec

The Face of the Oligarch Recovery – Luxury Skyscrapers Stay Empty as NYC Homeless Population Hits Record High

Portrait of the American Oligarchy – The Very Troubling Income and Wealth Trends Since 1989

Another Oligarch Preaches to the Peasants – Charlie Munger Says “Prepare for Harder World”

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

6 thoughts on “Number of NYC Apartments for Rent Above $50k/Month Triples Since ’08; 82% of U.S. Construction = Luxury Units”

  1. Maybe I’m reading more into this story than is there: do lower income people have a right to live in New York? I don’t think so. If prices are not to your liking, move. The dirty little secret is that the oligarchs know that the lower/middle classes won’t leave. They act like the serfs of old.

    In the middle ages people never went more than 25 miles from where they were born. I run into lots of people who seem to have this serf mentality today: they think just because they were born somewhere they have to stay there. This includes the country, not just city/county/state. The world is your oyster. Overcome the serf mentality that you need to stay attached to your master. If the little people left New York the oligarchs would have to scrub their own floors and pick up their own trash. Not much chance of that.

    Reply
  2. Yes, I did overlook that fact. Although I’m still not sure what that means. It could mean that there is a shortage of luxury multifamily units, based on market surveys of demand. Does that mean there are already enough entry/middle level units available? I live somewhat in the middle of nowhere so I have no idea what the vacancy rates are in the big cities.

    If the units are being built to satisfy a demand, I don’t see a problem. 303,000 units (82% of 370,000) over 54 cities is about 5600 units per city. Doesn’t seem like a big number if we are talking metro areas. It looks like there are just over 40M rental units in the country, so that’s less than a 1% change overall.

    I guess the other possibility is that those with money are betting on inflation and investing in hard assets. I don’t think housing will be a problem in the future due to collapsing demographics. Once the baby boomers are gone there will be lots of housing units sitting empty. Maybe once the borders are opened (and they will be) there might be enough bodies to cause a problem. At that point D.C. will have to step in and build welfare projects again. History rhyming again.

    Reply
  3. @Brandon: The article was not about Africa or Syria. It started out complaining about expensive housing in one city, and then purported to show that building “luxury” units that in number are less than 1% of the existing housing units in the country is somehow a problem. And underlying the discussion is the idea that somehow “the government” should fix this problem of “income inequality”. Until you understand that it is the government that is causing the widening wealth gap you will never understand what needs to be done to fix it.

    But as long as you brought up Africa and Syria, perhaps you have not been following the news. Want to see what people who are serious about taking control of their own lives (and not waiting around for “the government” to fix things) are willing to do? How about people from “Africa and Syria” who are jumping on boats and rafts and whatever else will float to escape the hell they are in for a chance at something better. That’s how you change your life. The U.S. was founded and built by people who were willing to take a chance rather than sit around belly aching about how bad their life is and why the government is not fixing it. We seem to have bred that kind of risk taking out of most of the native born populace in the U.S.. That’s why so many more businesses are founded by immigrants.

    The purpose of the government in D.C. is to prevent the future from happening. They are going to protect the old guard from change. That means keeping the wealthy on top. If you are expecting D.C. to tear down the 1% you will be waiting a long time.

    Reply

Leave a Reply