This is What School Lunch Looks Like in Chickasha, Oklahoma

This has to be a joke.

I don’t think this is a joke.

Please, someone tell me this is a joke.

Screen Shot 2014-10-17 at 11.57.17 AM

From EAGNews:

CHICKASHA, Okla. – Lunch meat, a couple of crackers, a slice of cheese and two pieces of cauliflower qualified as lunch in Chickasha Public Schools Monday.

Student Kaytlin Shelton took a photo of the skimpy lunch and showed it to her parents.

“It makes me want to take that and take it to the Superintendent and tell him to eat it for lunch,” the girl tells Fox 25.

“I can go pay a dollar for a Lunchable and get more food in it,” her father, Vince Holton, says.

Shelton is pregnant and eating for two, complicating the problem.

Chickasha superintendent David Cash agrees the skimpy lunches need to be addressed.

Oh, but here’s the best part…

The new lunch complies with lunch regulations championed by First Lady Michelle Obama and implemented by the USDA.

If her plan is to starve children to death, then it seems to be on track.

According to FOX25 in Oklahoma, that feast of lunch meat, a couple crackers, a slice of cheese and two pieces of cauliflower is served to students every other week.

Eat up boys and girls!

In Liberty,
Michael Krieger


Protect your wealth – Buy Gold and Silver Bullion with Goldbroker.com


Like this post?
Donate bitcoins: 35DBUbbAQHTqbDaAc5mAaN6BqwA2AxuE7G


Follow me on Twitter.

19 thoughts on “This is What School Lunch Looks Like in Chickasha, Oklahoma”

  1. The joke is that, in addition to subbing out their child’s education to the state, people sub out their child’s nutrition to the state. WTF were they expecting to happen?

    Thank God (and my parents) that I went to private school and brought my own lunch.

    Reply
  2. In the long run perhaps this is the method to acclimate the “public” to having food doled out per person. Across the board a predetermined allotment of food by types and amounts, with the choicest to the higher income earners and welfare recipients. Oh, it’s a Brave New World, socialist that is.

    Reply
  3. And take a look at all the trash that is generated as a result of this lunch – the costs of manufacturing the materials, disposal, Styrofoam. Liberals are frauds. They operate with the mind of a three-year-old. Their methods must be exposed, they must be embarrassed, they must be stopped.

    Reply
    • My thoughts too, so much garbage generated by such a meagre meal, as well as the comment Hank had about potentially dirty wrappers being placed on top of unwrapped food.

      Such a “meal” can only be created by someone who has no idea how to create food, most civilisations develop some staple foods that are simple and efficicent. From just the UK I can think of the Cob (roll), sandwiches and cornish pasty, the packaging they need is a tiny fraction of this one too.

      I do feel sorry for the kids forced to eat this junk, even convicts deserve better, the only vaguely nutritional bits are the cauliflower, but who wants to eat that? Especially uncooked, the reason its there no doubt is because it is much cheaper then fresh fruit.

  4. and those tremendous casino revenues earmarked for “education”. somebody’s gettin’ fat while the classrooms are always short. Same story in every state with lotterys or other legal gambling.

    Reply
  5. I checked (which is probably what none of you did, including the author). According to the bill, the reason there are two pieces of cauliflower is this proposal: “Offer vegetables as a separate food component at lunch daily.” The reason for the crackers is: “Offer at least a daily serving of grains at breakfast and lunch.” And etc.

    What Michael Kreiger did not address was the real reason for a crappy lunch: this is a poor school district in a town where 20% of the population are below the poverty line.

    Reply
  6. I went to school in the 50s and school lunches were cooked in the school kitchen. Real meat, veggies, salad, fruit and milk in individual containers. A hot meal with ice cream or pudding in the À la carte line. And it only cost $0.25 ($2.47 in 2014 dollars.) But then, minimum wage was $0.75/hr. ( $7.40 today) It is ALL relative, but in my day, a school lunch like above would never have been offered. They would know better and the parents would have torn the School Board a new ….

    Reply
    • Didn’t read the part about “offered every other week,” huh?

      Or did you want to appear completely ignorant of the topic?

  7. Didn’t Sherriff Arpaio already telegraph this kind of thing?

    “You’re captive, we’re paying for it, so you get this or nothing.”

    Reply
  8. the only healthy part of that sad offering is the cauliflower,
    psuedo ham cheese n sad looking crackers none of which would be without a nice helping of chemicals/colours/preservatives

    Reply

Leave a Reply